Return-Path: Received: from rly-de09.mx.aol.com (rly-de09.mail.aol.com [172.19.170.145]) by air-de05.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINDE051-4fd48a81bf41d6; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:39:30 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-de09.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDE092-4fd48a81bf41d6; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:39:18 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KUhX4-0001vJ-E2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:38:54 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KUhX3-0001vA-Ma for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:38:53 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s4.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.15]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KUhX0-0000tg-Bq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:38:53 +0100 Received: from BLU146-W26 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s4.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:38:43 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [202.156.8.9] From: "Laurence 9V1 LF KL1 X" To: Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:38:43 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <0a0701c9005f$49c68590$7900a8c0@athlon1200> References: <1168921389.2368891218526813954.JavaMail.mail@webmail07> <001c01c8fc6c$ae9a8990$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <1KSsk5-21hpBI0@fwd26.t-online.de> <0a0701c9005f$49c68590$7900a8c0@athlon1200> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Aug 2008 12:38:43.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[2EF03C50:01C90066] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_c916bbc9-e308-43b8-abc8-1b5638d6fc09_" Subject: RE: LF: new cw yahoo group X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ~ X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --_c916bbc9-e308-43b8-abc8-1b5638d6fc09_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was still using a morse print to tape machine into the 70's - commercially= any way. Racking my brain to remember the part number but it probably was a Creed of=20= some version Laurence > From: tractorb@ihug.co.nz> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Date: Sun, 17= Aug 2008 23:49:20 +1200> Subject: Re: LF: new cw yahoo group> > ----- Origi= nal Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:05 AM> Subject: Re: L= F: new cw yahoo group> > > > As far as I know commercial morse services neve= r tried to use the > > morse> > code for printing.> SNIP............> > Wild= ly OT- but in fact- machine printing morse systems predated most > other var= iants of machine printing telegraphy. These were, of course, > wireline syst= ems, not radio link based. The mechanics of the last > generation of page (a= s opposed to tape) printing systems were > incredible. Among some of the 'mu= seum' stuff I have here, there is a > GNT morse transmitter (Wheatstone patt= ern) that uses pre-punched paper > tape and can operate at well over 200 wpm= .> 73> Dave, ZL3FJ> > > >=20 _________________________________________________________________ Be the filmmaker you always wanted to beearn how to burn a DVD with Windows. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588797/direct/01/=3D --_c916bbc9-e308-43b8-abc8-1b5638d6fc09_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was still using a morse print to tape machine in= to the 70's - commercially any way.

Racking my brain to remember the part number but it probably was a Creed of=20= some version

Laurence



> From: tractorb@ihug.co.nz
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
&= gt; Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:49:20 +1200
> Subject: Re: LF: new cw ya= hoo group
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <h= ajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.or= g>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:05 AM
> Subject: Re:= LF: new cw yahoo group
>
>
> > As far as I know comm= ercial morse services never tried to use the
> > morse
> >= ; code for printing.
> SNIP............
>
> Wildly OT- bu= t in fact- machine printing morse systems predated most
> other varia= nts of machine printing telegraphy. These were, of course,
> wireline= systems, not radio link based. The mechanics of the last
> generatio= n of page (as opposed to tape) printing systems were
> incredible. Am= ong some of the 'museum' stuff I have here, there is a
> GNT morse tr= ansmitter (Wheatstone pattern) that uses pre-punched paper
> tape and= can operate at well over 200 wpm.
> 73
> Dave, ZL3FJ
> >
>
>


Be the filmmaker you always wan= ted to beearn how to burn a DVD with Windows. Make your smash hit =3D --_c916bbc9-e308-43b8-abc8-1b5638d6fc09_--