Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd06.mx.aol.com (rly-dd06.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.153]) by air-dd02.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINDD024-b854899d93739f; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:02:58 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd06.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD067-b854899d93739f; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:02:52 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KQmP1-0000OK-5E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:02:23 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KQmP0-0000OB-ME for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:02:22 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.128.234] helo=smtp.talktalk.net) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KQmOx-00025G-Fj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:02:22 +0100 X-Path: TTSMTP X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAHt1mUhOlWEj/2dsb2JhbACEMakg Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([78.149.97.35]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP; 06 Aug 2008 18:02:11 +0100 Message-ID: <003f01c8f7e6$2b7ab560$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <001a01c8f7a6$aae89460$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <002d01c8f7d8$8ab78a20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:02:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.135 Subject: Re: LF: Tick test Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n I suppose the students cannot be blamed, since 1979 its their only option, no alternative. The examination board and those that advised them are responsible. I have heard tales from those that passed the tick test that they would have failed the old written exams, in fact some admit to having failed the pre 1979 test but passed later ticking boxes. Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Pratt" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:06 PM Subject: Re: LF: Tick test > In a recent message, mal hamilton wrote ... >>David. >>What year did the tick test start? >>Mal/G3KEV > > May 1979 > > 73 > David > -- > +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > | David M Pratt, Kippax, Leeds, UK | > | http://www.g4dmp.co.uk | > +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > > >