Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc10.mx.aol.com (rly-dc10.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.39]) by air-dc03.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC032-b46480d465f57; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:59:09 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc10.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC102-b46480d465f57; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:58:57 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Jo7mR-0004Sa-Ut for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:58:47 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Jo7mR-0004SR-3w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:58:47 +0100 Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.24]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jo7mL-0000lj-Qb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:58:47 +0100 Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GP1u1Z03d0b6N64A208P00; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:56:55 +0000 Received: from amailcenter05.comcast.net ([204.127.225.105]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GRyW1Z0022H40ZG8P00000; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:58:30 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Mgb/2meuCChLGpNkZ+lPxQ==:17 a=ysiYkyE4AAAA:8 a=UZkxsb9Dlu7xJdBkvzIA:9 a=87Qhgmg3DXh_WW-g-cQA:7 a=tMnWw-2zG3gAS_8SHDzN_LipWBwA:4 a=Nr7Pmq0tdocA:10 a=2mYow5eUDuQA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=XF7b4UCPwd8A:10 Received: from [96.233.44.163] by amailcenter05.comcast.net; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:58:27 +0000 From: k2ors@comcast.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, Cc: "Alan Melia" Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:58:27 +0000 Message-Id: <042220080158.4614.480D46430003A74E0000120622155670749C9D01CD05@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 30 2007) X-Authenticated-Sender: azJvcnNAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ= X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: Reflector problems X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Alan, Alberto, Dave, John and those that have responded directly off the list. Hopefully things will get sorted out soon. -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ 136-140kHz WD2XSH/23 505-510kHz WE2XEB/2 160-189kHz WE2XGR/1 505-515kHz FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Alan Melia" > Hi Alberto yes it is a while back now but I had several cases of postings > taking 3 and 5 weeks to get reflected !!. But owners I know say it is not a > fit and forget and list membership needs constantly checking.....to the > stage when the first couple of messages need to be moderated. There seem to > be people who bother to register manually to loads of groups and then sell > the registrations much later when moderator vigilance has lapsed. The Groups > I sub to are a mixed bag some I will only use web site access because they > are so badly compromised..... in some cases it is quite difficult to find > the real messages. But then also some groups seem like an owner > ego-trip....I visited one recently where 95% or more of the messages were > from the owner !! > > Best Wishes > Alan G3NYK > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alberto di Bene" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:30 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Reflector problems > > > > Alan Melia wrote: > > > > > > To Dave's comment I dont think Yahoo is any better it has had some > pretty > > > bad problems over the last year or so, and there is quite a lot of > > > resistance to their intrusive registration data requirements. > > > > Hi Alan, > > > > just my two cents about Yahoo. While it maybe wants to know a bit too > much about you, for the rest it is today much > > better than a couple of years ago, I administer three lists on Yahoo, and > frankly never had a problem. A few attempts of > > spam were correctly identified by the spam filters, and routed to me, as > administrator, for approval or rejection. > > > > But, as our US friends use to say, YMMV .... > > > > 73 Alberto I2PHD > > > > > >