Return-Path: Received: from rly-me09.mx.aol.com (rly-me09.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.43]) by air-me07.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME072-9d847b587d9254; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:39:08 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me09.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME094-9d847b587d9254; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:38:51 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JPzp7-0000du-0G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:37:49 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JPzp6-0000dl-DX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:37:48 +0000 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JPzoz-0003BP-JV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:37:48 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1273099ugf.13 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:37:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:reply-to:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:from; bh=IUYChc/4wLZQM9yQUcPOTNxRu4nQZ07zO7IsUA+p+o0=; b=KBnPBBEDrgvrgHTirAvc9lGfaIg9Sv03h0y/fuGD0Fcj/05i65O1voRaJ2jE518gFHYkDFWJn6/H+Uo13FsxOYaw7bWFLeAqejAjOQAc+dk7YKWDQw+f0ArqKed1ZcbYTCUr5m+cuVOS2eLkhBihMSPACFgHBGOOFSLJ/vB+0A8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:reply-to:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:from; b=FLeXMhrOIP57ategEJFtMFwwLlicQ0y26m+8YB/fKVgEd3DUiJ9DWiUQ2u1J3yLomoFRwfeHDIcYBOCfSFKaUXZ7TZ+fQVqoZfyyKz1v4qZ/F5QXtbXORoTGzAeAi9fEz55QjzKtQ/pnS9tiW9QNmh0bcmf2iDUX6snw1qP88rI= Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr1093303ugg.20.1203079040926; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from Neptune ( [87.194.205.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q40sm17188771ugc.70.2008.02.15.04.37.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:37:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00c501c86fcf$7fab1110$6401a8c0@Neptune> To: References: <003001c86ce7$e1cd6a40$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> <767934060.1203050068.188357108.58604@mcgi55.rambler.ru> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:37:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 From: Jan Verduyn DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ? X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m187.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM = 3 I expect it is only a matter of time before CW Skimmer will cope with poor quality CW signals, similarly to what CWGet is apparently capable of. Just a case of implementing an the algorithm. If I had to name software authors who are capable of doing this than Alex the author of CW Skimmer would be at the top of my list... It's not that many years ago that a skilled CW operator beat the PC at decoding CW signals just below noiselevel...with QRSS this has now been accepted that a PC does better. I ran CW Skimmer during 160m contest on 26th Jan and it decoded some 130+ stations using a softrock RX... extremely impressive software. Jan G0BBL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman ." To: Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:34 AM Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer That systems are working with 'ideal' quality CW signal only. The other famous shareware program CW skimmer in russia is UA9OSV CwGet: http://www.dxsoft.com/ru/products/cwget/ * John W Gould [Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:54:10 -0000]: > Not sure if this has been mentioned on this group but an interesting > piece > of software by Alex, VE3NEA, called CW Skimmer has recently been made > available, see > http://www.dxatlas.com/CwSkimmer/ > > Although the software costs $75 one can download a trial version (30 > days). > It's interesting to see that whilst away from the shack this evening the > program correctly identified G3KEV (501.9 at 19:35) and also G0MRF > (503.0 at > 19:37). The callsign picking routine must have been designed for the > HF > bands, where the protocol is very mature, so got a bit confused with the > protocol used on 500kHz and eventually decided that David callsign was > IO91TK! > > It seems to need a reasonable S/N, but could be quite useful if one is > not > able to personally monitor the band all of the time. Have others tried > it? > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > > -- Roman ..