Return-Path: Received: from rly-db05.mx.aol.com (rly-db05.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.80]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB064-aca47a786073b9; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:39:37 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db05.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB058-aca47a786073b9; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:39:21 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JM91G-0006c3-L6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:38:26 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JM91G-0006bu-5S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:38:26 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.159]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JM91D-0008CB-CW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:38:26 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 13D591C00088 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:38:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.45.80]) by mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id BD8691C00087 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:38:15 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20080204213815776.BD8691C00087@mwinf3412.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <008901c86776$40e2daf0$0300000a@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <016101c61d02$12ceca40$2101a8c0@pcroelof> <43CFCE5D.5000504@usa.net> <20060119232216.u1kyilxv57r4scgg@webmail.versatel.de> <43D0258B.2000601@usa.net> <43D027B8.1000300@usa.net> <43E7DF30.2060108@usa.net> <002501c86748$60c727f0$2101a8c0@PCRoelof> <001301c8675f$b3a5ca00$0900a8c0@Lark> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:38:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n .. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 6:56 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise > Hi Roelof, this was not addressed to me but I feel I can maybe contribute > and opinion. I think it all depends on what you are wanting the sound card > to do. If you are using it as the "I/Q converter" in an SDR the the best > card produces the best results. the vital thing here is the noise level > which affects the dynamic range available, then the sampling frequency and > timing. > > Your post tends to suggest that the queries are from people using Spectran > to process the audio from a receiver. In this case the achievable dynamic > range can be similar but it is not necessary for detecting small signals > which are essential buried in the noise from the reciever. I have the > internal on-board sound and an PCI M-Audio Delta 44, and I do not think I > could detect any difference when using Spectran. More important things are > keeping PC noise out of the receiver and ensuring the antenna is the > quietest are available to you but providing the highest voltage of wanted > signals. > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roelof Bakker" > To: > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:09 PM > Subject: LF: Re: Re: Mini Whip and local noise > > > Hello Alberto, > > Your program Spectran is in wide use amongst NDB chasers. > Someone had the following question: > >>> > Does the quality of the sound card influence the decoding or displaying > of signals received or it this all done in the Spectran software? Some > sound cards are available for $20 and others cost over $250. Will the > higher cost sound card produce a better quality of output signal than > the cheaper one? If yes, which sound card do you recommend specifically > for this application of decodind and displaying NDB signals? > << > > Your input will be much appreciated. > > 73, > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt > > > > -- > Mijn Postvak In wordt beschermd door SPAMfighter. > 705 spam-mails zijn er tot op heden geblokkeerd. > Download de gratis SPAMfighter via deze link: > http://www.spamfighter.com/lnl > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1258 - Release Date: 2/4/2008 > 10:10 > >