Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg01.mx.aol.com (rly-mg01.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.107]) by air-mg01.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMG011-9f347b5c0a489; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:41:43 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg01.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG015-9f347b5c0a489; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:41:11 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JQ3cU-0001Do-CU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:41:02 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JQ3cT-0001Df-TG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:41:01 +0000 Received: from wmsmtp.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.253] helo=smtp.talktalk.net) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ3cN-0004ys-Db for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:41:01 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO g3kev) ([78.144.144.60]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP; 15 Feb 2008 16:40:27 +0000 X-Path: TTSMTP Message-ID: <000d01c86ff1$778d0070$0301a8c0@g3kev> From: "mal" To: References: <003001c86ce7$e1cd6a40$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> <767934060.1203050068.188357108.58604@mcgi55.rambler.ru> <00c501c86fcf$7fab1110$6401a8c0@Neptune> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:40:25 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Verduyn" To: Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer It is virtually impossible for a machine to read poor morse because when the elements are split up you get a different character to that intended. > I expect it is only a matter of time before CW Skimmer will cope with poor > quality CW signals, similarly to what CWGet is apparently capable of. > Just a case of implementing an the algorithm. If I had to name software > authors who are capable of doing this than Alex the author of CW Skimmer > would be at the top of my list... > > It's not that many years ago that a skilled CW operator beat the PC at > decoding CW signals just below noiselevel...with QRSS this has now been > accepted that a PC does better. > > I ran CW Skimmer during 160m contest on 26th Jan and it decoded some 130+ > stations using a softrock RX... extremely impressive software What about the 700 plus that you missed. > > Jan G0BBL > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roman ." > To: > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:34 AM > Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer > > > That systems are working with 'ideal' quality CW signal only. > The other famous shareware program CW skimmer in russia is UA9OSV CwGet: > http://www.dxsoft.com/ru/products/cwget/ > > > > * John W Gould [Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:54:10 -0000]: > > Not sure if this has been mentioned on this group but an interesting > > piece > > of software by Alex, VE3NEA, called CW Skimmer has recently been made > > available, see > > http://www.dxatlas.com/CwSkimmer/ > > > > Although the software costs $75 one can download a trial version (30 > > days). > > It's interesting to see that whilst away from the shack this evening > the > > program correctly identified G3KEV (501.9 at 19:35) and also G0MRF > > (503.0 at > > 19:37). The callsign picking routine must have been designed for the > > HF > > bands, where the protocol is very mature, so got a bit confused with > the > > protocol used on 500kHz and eventually decided that David callsign was > > IO91TK! > > > > It seems to need a reasonable S/N, but could be quite useful if one is > > not > > able to personally monitor the band all of the time. Have others > tried > > it? > > > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > > > > > > > > -- > Roman .. > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.5/1279 - Release Date: 14/02/2008 18:35 >