Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma06.mx.aol.com (rly-ma06.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.50]) by air-ma01.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA013-8b3479dacf8be; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:23:08 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma06.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA065-8b3479dacf8be; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:22:54 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JJR6N-0001NR-Vl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:20:31 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JJR6M-0001NI-9Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:20:30 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JJR6H-00029r-Bj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:20:30 +0000 Received: from lurcher.twatt.local (lurcher.twatt.local [127.0.1.1]) by lurcher.twatt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B175DA4CF for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:19:50 +0000 (GMT) From: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV X-X-Sender: gm4slv@lurcher.twatt.local To: rsgb In-Reply-To: <88d2415e0801280148r3387041awc60ff337cdbfe549@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <88d2415e0801280148r3387041awc60ff337cdbfe549@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Pine MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=0.234 Subject: Re: LF: Re. GM4SLV Grabber Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n Hello Laurie & LF, On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, lawrence mayhead wrote: > John, > I have been looking at your excellent 500kHz Grabber Thanks! > and notice that some strong signals are de-sentising > the receiver and causing other weaker signals to show > up less clearly. I belive you are using an AOR AR7030 > Rx and I wonder wether you have the AGC on or off ? The RX (an AR7030) AGC is ON normally. I also notice the de-sensing caused by AGC action, usually during the evening, when DI2AM is fairly strong. I tried running with the AGC off. Once the RF gain has been set correctly, works well. The downside is that it severely overdrives the soundcard when I'm transmitting on 500. With the AGC on the AR7030 can wind back its gain, and switch in extra RF attenuation, so the audio level to the soundcard doesn't "hit the rails". The isolation of the antenna c/o relay in the TX is good so the receivers aren't muted during transmit (I've measured the level of leakage and it was okay, although my notes are at home so can't remember the actual measured levels) so I decided to leave the AR7030 AGC on and let it cope on its own. At the moment the 500kHz antenna needs tuning, recent weather has rattled the ATU and the variometer needs a tweak, so I've not been active on TX for a week or 2. I suppose what I should do is turn the AGC off for most of the time and turn it on during operating periods. > I have noticed this effect with some receivers, even with > AGC OFF there is still some control of Rx gain, but had > hoped that the 7030 would not suffer from this defect. As far as I can tell the AR7030 is pretty well linear with the AGC off. I've used it before, AGC off, for 5MHz beacon monitoring, and it worked well. I seem to remember doing some checks with signal generator and attenuators in the past. I'll turn the AGC off later and leave it running like that, so you can see how it performs. The 7030 is an excellent RX for this style of operation. It's a pain at times when driving it manually and looking for tiny signals. It's very capable of hearing stuff, but the user interface, with all the various things you want to tweak (RF gain/filter bandwidths/Pass Band Tuning) etc all being on different menus. The VFO is also odd, with the smallest steps being fractional Hz so it's not possible to tune in exact multiples of 1Hz. As a stable peice of test equipment it's prety good, as a "tune around the band looking for weak signals" it can be a pain. Until I started on 500kHZ (and also NDB hunting) I always thought it was fine, and couldn't understand the antipathy others had for the menu system etc. For a "tune and forget" long term monitoring RX it's great. Cheers, John