Message-ID: <47952C20.20105@toya.net.pl>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:34:56 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgTcWCeW5hcnNraQ==?= <sq7mpj@toya.net.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <003601c85bb2$ced17940$0100007f@w4o8m9> <371125448.20080121175438@gmx.de> <4794DB51.9050708@w1tag.com> <117725913.20080121215453@gmx.de> <003701c85c7b$68b9d0c0$99188351@w4o8m9>
In-Reply-To: <003701c85c7b$68b9d0c0$99188351@w4o8m9>
Subject: Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


James Moritz wrote:

>Dear LF Group,
>
>The WOLF beacon is now running again from 2200utc. I am now using WOLF 20
>mode, "by popular request". Frequency is 503.800 as before - any reports
>welcome, or comparison with the previous WOLF 10 sigs. The idea is that the
>faster mode may be beneficial for short-duration peaks in signal strength
>occuring on 500kHz.
>
>  
>
>  
>
Hi Jim. LF
just few minutes ago i got it on my screen :)

2008-01-21 23:05:13 >WOLF20  -r 11025 -f 600 -t 2 -w 0.0000
t:  12 f: 0.435 a:-1.4 dp: 84.3 ci:10 cj:382 *G2X04COZNR7KXY ?
t:  24 f: 0.443 a: 1.4 dp: 82.1 ci: 2 cj: 83 9NKOL67D6BYS5I0 ?
t:  48 f: 1.678 a:-1.1 dp: 78.7 ci: 5 cj:148 Y9D9LZDP2DOTCDA -
t:  96 f: 0.000 pm:46.42 jm:363 q:-11.7 -9.1 9DDOLPBB7P.B.J1 ?
t: 144 f: 1.504 pm:50.12 jm:940 q:-11.9 -8.3 W1KC3C???OABLOP ?
t: 192 f: 0.742 pm:54.15 jm:191 q:-10.3 -7.3 RXV7M/9 DA030F7 ?
t: 240 f: 1.875 pm:60.90 jm:852 q: -9.1 -7.1 31PFO99Y373B/UW ?
t: 288 f: 0.020 pm:76.49 jm:300 q: -6.0 -8.3 MH13.3EU4G37CNM ?
t: 336 f: 0.020 pm:110.1 jm:300 q: -4.3 -5.3 M0BMUAEU4G37CN  -
t: 384 f: 0.020 pm:137.2 jm:300 q: -3.4 -5.2 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 432 f: 0.020 pm:152.1 jm:300 q: -3.4 -4.9 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 480 f: 0.020 pm:161.8 jm:300 q: -2.9 -4.1 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 528 f: 0.020 pm:175.9 jm:300 q: -2.8 -3.9 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 576 f: 0.020 pm:199.1 jm:300 q: -2.1 -3.3 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 624 f: 0.020 pm:207.8 jm:300 q: -2.0 -2.7 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 672 f: 0.020 pm:219.9 jm:300 q: -1.8 -2.8 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 720 f: 0.020 pm:223.8 jm:300 q: -1.8 -3.0 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 768 f: 0.020 pm:225.4 jm:300 q: -1.8 -3.3 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 816 f: 0.020 pm:226.2 jm:300 q: -1.7 -3.4 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 864 f: 0.020 pm:226.7 jm:300 q: -1.7 -3.5 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 912 f: 0.020 pm:228.4 jm:300 q: -1.6 -3.6 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t: 960 f: 0.020 pm:238.9 jm:300 q: -1.4 -3.7 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t:1008 f: 0.020 pm:243.2 jm:300 q: -1.1 -3.5 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t:1056 f: 0.020 pm:244.1 jm:300 q: -1.0 -3.9 M0BMU 600M BCN  -
t:1104 f: 0.020 pm:257.7 jm:300 q: -1.0 -3.9 M0BMU 600M BCN  -

  recently i posted an e-mail to LF group with my first ever reception 
of ham stastion on 137 khz. while i sent few posts
  reporting my 600 m screens this one is the FIRST ever one from  
England it just happend to be you, Jim  :):)

                                                   cheers, peter, 
sq7mpj  /jo91rs/