Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (rly-dc03.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.32]) by air-dc05.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC052-b0d479f16383d; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:04:19 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc03.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC031-b0d479f16383d; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:04:10 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JJpBu-00058q-2d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:50 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JJpBt-00058h-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:49 +0000 Received: from mx1.netbanx.com ([217.33.219.138]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JJpBr-0001Is-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:49 +0000 Received: from mx1.netbanx.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.netbanx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362CB6A002E for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=netbanx.com; h=from:to: references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=secure; bh=H qxCvLItUft3Z/lB+XfME2toI2I=; b=t9eZ9nh8KPSuAUOiSrxNQKmH+aRycc6ZH y6t7EeZOXfQbISGTiBt3uWG1I/JwATw/Zxe0+jdfS9SHw/uaRiAIBVfjfpOpnTYl L3kcwW7JbxqSD0fX8kZxWS/oJST+dyQDFUi2r1iUeduqQUpMC8jkRGpW+clvxVi6 eI5whg674g= Received: from AndrewPoodle (unknown [192.168.5.48]) by mx1.netbanx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3FF6A002E for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:42 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dominic Baines" To: References: <001001c86269$202430f0$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:03:42 -0000 Message-ID: <004a01c8626e$fdb855e0$3005a8c0@AndrewPoodle> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Achho8c4oGVSqZaXSYOsMWNQfhJZiAAAQtpwACzvQSAABBvLYAABefPg In-Reply-To: <001001c86269$202430f0$0d01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-NetBanx-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NetBanx-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-1.184, required 4.8, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_40 -0.18, DK_POLICY_TESTING 0.00, J_CHICKENPOX_13 0.80) X-NetBanx-MailScanner-From: dbaines@netbanx.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: RE: 500kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : + X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d165.1 ; domain : netbanx.com DKIM = 3 Thanks John, Will resend it in. 73 Dom -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John W Gould Sent: 29 January 2008 11:22 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: 500kHz Dom, thanks for raising the issue of the NoV, as I guess others are keen to know where we all stand. RSGB, at its quarterly meeting with Ofcom last September, raised the issue of NoV extension, as well as requesting an increase of ERP. As you may recall several of the correspondents on this reflector provided me with some useful material for our case. Ofcom commented then that they would need to gain a view from the primary user, Maritime and Coastguard Agency, as well as wait until the outcome of WRC-07 was known. I view that as sensible, since apart from the small matter of RR5.83 that prohibited non-distress use of the band 495-505kHz, there was an WRC agenda item concerning maritime use of the spectrum in this area of interest. We had a further quarterly meeting with Ofcom last week and we were told that they would be making an announcement concerning the matter during the first half of February. There is nothing that individual NoV holders need to do apart from wait patiently! As far as your own NoV is concerned I suggest that you progress it again - I haven't seen the application. 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF Manager g3wkl@btinternet.com