Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (rly-dd08.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.155]) by air-dd02.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINDD022-b944745aa9d30e; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:13:40 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd08.mx.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD086-b944745aa9d30e; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:13:19 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IvEfF-0002A0-Sy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:12:29 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IvEfF-00029r-9S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:12:29 +0000 Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.co.uk ([193.252.22.156] helo=smtp3.freeserve.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IvEfC-00045N-46 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:12:29 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3201.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0AEB07000089 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:12:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.24.170]) by mwinf3201.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id A2734700008D for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:12:19 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20071122161219665.A2734700008D@mwinf3201.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <002601c82d22$76ede7e0$0e00000a@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <479510729@web.de> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:12:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.080,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: QSW/QTV Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01C82D22.709637D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C82D22.709637D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .. As we seem to have a nautical flavour to the exchange, perhaps we ha= ve a descendant of Mr Edward Teach in our midst, who although a fine seaman= did bend the rules slightly . to quote >> To avoid any ambiguity xband work= ing 500/HF. I will use the HF freqs at times and use QSW or QTV 505.5 khz <<<=20 505.5 ? web link reveals all=20 =20 http://www.elizabethan-era.org.uk/famous-pirates.htm =20 G ..=20 ---- Original Message -----=20 From: di2am@web.de=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:55 PM Subject: Re: LF: QSW/QTV Hi all, the use of QSW by Mal was correct. The meaning of QTV is misunderstood. In the "good old times" we used it in= the fishery fleet in the sence: "Could you take over my watch duties?" or "Shall I take over your duties?" or affirmativ "Pls take over my listening watch" or "I will take over your watch duties"= . E.g.:=20 There are 2 or more vessels on the same fishing ground having stable vhf-c= ontact. The radio officer of one of the vsls has an urgent other job to do,=20= for instance repairs on navigational or sonar equipment. So he asks an other= r/o of the fleet "qtv?". If positive answered the other r/o will stand list= ening watch for his colleague on 500 kcs and/or other freqs and inform him b= y vhf if necessary. 73 &nb sp; Joerg, DL3NRV ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.3/1144 - Release Date: 11/21/200= 7 16:28 ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C82D22.709637D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 

 ..  As we seem to&n= bsp;=20 have a nautical flavour to the exchange, perhaps we have a descendant of&n= bsp;=20 Mr Edward Teach in our midst, who although a fine seaman did bend the rule= s=20 slightly … to quote >> To avoid any ambiguity xband working 50= 0/HF. I=20 will use the HF freqs at
times and use QSW or QTV 505.5 khz=20 <<< 

 

 505.5 ? web link reveals all=20

 

http://www.= elizabethan-era.org.uk/famous-pirates.htm

 

G ..

 
 
---- Original Message -----
di2am@web.de
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1= :55=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QSW/QTV

Hi all,

the use of QSW by Mal was correct.

The meaning of QTV is misunderstood. In the "good old times" we used it= in=20 the fishery fleet in the sence:

"Could you take over my watch duties?" or "Shall I take over your=20 duties?"

or affirmativ

"Pls take over my listening watch" or "I will take over your watch=20 duties".

E.g.:

There are 2 or more vessels on the same fishing ground having stable=20 vhf-contact. The radio officer of one of the vsls has an urgent other job=20= to=20 do, for instance repairs on navigational or sonar equipment. So he asks an= =20 other r/o of the fleet "qtv?". If positive answered the other r/o will sta= nd=20 listening watch for his colleague on 500 kcs and/or other freqs and inform= him=20 by vhf if necessary.

73

  &nb sp;  Joerg, DL3NRV

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free=20 Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.3/1144 - Release Da= te:=20 11/21/2007 16:28
------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C82D22.709637D0--