Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg02.mx.aol.com (rly-mg02.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.108]) by air-mg04.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINMG042-9f7474c50cb7f; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:16:29 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg02.mx.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG021-9f7474c50cb7f; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:15:57 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ix41m-0005Eu-7h for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:15:18 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ix41l-0005El-OE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:15:17 +0000 Received: from smtpout0191.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.191] helo=n064.sc1.he.tucows.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ix41h-0008SE-Tc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:15:17 +0000 Received: from sc1-out03.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n064.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47030C3D004BC245 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:15:02 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,545e3004b83a3e79,f936fee2e2170569,g3kev.ham@virgin.net,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:600:601:945:946:960:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1542:1587:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2194:2198:2199:2200:2379:2393:2551:2553:2559:2562:2689:2828:3027:3355:3636:3743:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4184:4250:5007:6117:6119:7576:7619,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian: 0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from g3kev (unknown [64.97.206.40]) by sc1-out03.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <000401c83119$0c401990$3de4fc3e@g3kev> From: "hamilton mal" To: References: Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:50:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: R: classs E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n Hi Enrico The cct diagram is too large for the reflector, so would have to go direct. It E pa is vy inter dependent on V/W/Q etc and pse refer to Tonne s/ware V2.01 for design criteria. Mine is qrp for 500 and works fb and reliable. No smoke etc hi Pse listen for me on 502.5 khz and call me on 3533/7033 khz for a xband QSO. 73 de Mal/G3KEV/IO9SH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enrico" To: Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:52 PM Subject: LF: R: classs E > Hi Mal, > can you please tell me what kind of PA are you using? Have you an electrical > scheme? > Thank you an Bye. > > IW4CXL > Enrico > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Per conto di hamilton mal > Inviato: domenica 18 novembre 2007 16.54 > A: rsgb > Oggetto: LF: classs E > > > Hi all > I carried out some analysis on my fet pa today to check the waveform for > true class E. Monitoring the drain on a scope revealed that the waveform was > almost correct but needed a slight increase in capacity for C2 for an almost > perfect switch at 502.5 khz. Increasing/decreasing the voltage did not make > a big difference to the waveform, at the design voltage it was only slightly > better. > Using a DL I altered the freq and found the perfect waveform at 535.9 khz, > so I expect logically increasing the value of C2 would correct the anamoly > at 502.5 khz. I have not altered it yet because I do not have a suitable > capicator. > I did observe some ripple on the waveform that is probably caused by feed > through from the driver, it was more pronunced at a V lower than the design > voltage, but improved with a V increase. > In spite of the above observations the PA performs well and seems very > robust. > The RF pwr out measurements using the DL or the Antenna do not vary, > indicating that the antenna is well matched to 50 ohms via the atu at the > base of the inv L. > I thought the above observations might be interesting to would be class E > constructors. > Considering mine was built from junk box bits, including the 60 year old > ceramic ex TU5 tuning unit coil it works very well. The fet is out of an > old marine tx. > Best dx to date VE1ZZ at 549 during ideal conditions last week. > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > > > > > >