X-GM-THRID: 1247315920145105677 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.2.20 with SMTP id 20cs69862fgb; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr1600388ugg.1189583278535; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y7si2354333ugc.2007.09.12.00.47.44; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IVMrj-0006MM-Nx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:42:27 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IVMrj-0006MD-7r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:42:27 +0100 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([82.200.88.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IVMrd-00010R-Oc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:42:27 +0100 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host194.ttk-90.sotline.ru [82.200.90.194]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8C7fh9Y038497 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:41:44 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA00207 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:23:44 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:23:44 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" In-Reply-To: <00aa01c7f49b$e76c4850$013a6a58@wgt01> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.8 (mx.omskcity.com [82.200.88.2]); Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:41:56 +0700 (OMSST) X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.498 Subject: Re: LF: Off Topic : New type of radio wave Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 878 Hi, LF. On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Interesting !!!! > > http://download.antennex.com/listarch/media/news.pdf Such a nonsence... Vector-potencial wave and conventional electromagnetic wave is the absolutely (!!!) the same things... What about detection by a plasma... may be may be (there is nothing detals to say more)... But any way it is a detection (if this is true) of a conventional EM-wave, nothing more... Referees of Phys.Rev. will laugh too much... 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb