Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
From: "Michael Probert" <mjprobert@ynysdawelcottages.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 09:44:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <46E2E1F7.29648.AB54D7@localhost>
Thread-Index: AcfyOh9F/7lQLVPYTIGJFxKoc5vTxwAf7JdQ
Message-Id: <E1IUIP0-00064j-4a@post.thorcom.com>
Subject: LF: RE: [500] Best receivers?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O


Hello Mike,

I use ICOM 718 transceivers which tune from 30mhz down to 30kHz. Has =
built
in switched pre amp but usually find unnecessary on 500 as the rx is
extremely sensitive.  Can only fit one i.f filter so I have two 718s. =
One
with 125hz and other with 250hz. Filters imported from the States.  At =
the
current price of around =A3400 it must be the best buy in the market at
present.
Hope XYL and yourself are both well.

73

Mike GW4HXO.

_________________________________________________________________________=
___
Subject: LF: [500] Best receivers?

Thanks to those who have so far provided input for the new edition of=20
LF Today.

My next question is what are people's favourite receivers for use at=20
500kHz?=20

My IC-706 seems adequate, but my TS-850 is deaf due to the=20
attentuator switched in to prevent overload in the MW broadcast band.=20
So what is your experience?

Thanks in advance for any data.

de Mike, G3XDV
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20


__________ NOD32 2488 (20070828) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com