X-GM-THRID: 1247018466744690326 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.2.20 with SMTP id 20cs48535fgb; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 05:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.249.16 with SMTP id w16mr2408414ugh.1189254437452; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si5640910ugp.2007.09.08.05.27.11; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ITzLq-0002aW-RP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:23:50 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ITzLq-0002aN-AQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:23:50 +0100 Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.co.uk ([193.252.22.158] helo=smtp1.freeserve.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ITzLk-0006z4-Qh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:23:50 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 67C8A1C00084 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.33.193]) by mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 205591C00082 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:23:39 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070908122339132.205591C00082@mwinf3009.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <002e01c7f213$229578b0$0e00000a@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:23:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: QRSS report on the beacon band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002B_01C7F21B.83D917F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6746 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C7F21B.83D917F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quite... G ..=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: G0MRF@aol.com=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 1:11 PM Subject: Re: LF: QRSS report on the beacon band Hi Peter. Thank you for the report. I know beacons are not everyone's idea of best band usage but I try to = keep my meagre 5mW out of the way at the top end of the band. (well, at = the top end of Dave's grabber which I use for monitoring) Also, I do get a couple of e-mails a week from people who tune their = radios down to 500k for the first time and then report the beacon as the = only signal that's there during the 10 or 15 mins they listen. If the band was full with people struggling to find space to have a = QSO I would of course switch it off. Thanks again David In a message dated 08/09/2007 11:00:18 GMT Standard Time, = m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk writes: I don't think I should be encouraging this but here it is any way. = MRF you are 579 at IO91UX. 80m dipole up 13m untuned RX TS690s wid no = mods. see attached trace. FMT -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.9/994 - Release Date: = 9/7/2007 16:40 ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C7F21B.83D917F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Quite...
 
G ..
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 G0MRF@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 08, = 2007 1:11=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS report on = the=20 beacon band

Hi Peter.
 
Thank you for the report.
 
I know beacons are not everyone's idea of best band usage = but I try=20 to keep my meagre 5mW out of the way at the top end of the = band.=20 (well, at the top end of Dave's grabber which I use for = monitoring)
Also, I do get a couple of e-mails a week from people who tune = their=20 radios down to 500k for the first time and then report the beacon as = the only=20 signal that's there during the 10 or 15 mins they listen.
If the band was full with people struggling to find space to have = a QSO I=20 would of course switch it off.
 
Thanks again
 
David
 
 
 
In a message dated 08/09/2007 11:00:18 GMT Standard Time,=20 m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk writes:
I don't think I should be encouraging this but here it is any = way. MRF=20 you are 579 at IO91UX. 80m dipole up 13m untuned  RX TS690s wid = no=20 mods. see attached trace.
 
FMT
 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free = Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.9/994 - Release = Date:=20 9/7/2007 16:40
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C7F21B.83D917F0--