X-GM-THRID: 1247139511449147780 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.2.20 with SMTP id 20cs67050fgb; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.237.14 with SMTP id k14mr3842030ugh.1189364920914; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si8030230ugp.2007.09.09.12.08.33; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IUS59-0003DK-7i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:04:31 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IUS58-0003DB-SC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:04:30 +0100 Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.co.uk ([193.252.22.158] helo=smtp1.freeserve.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IUS55-0002A1-2a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:04:30 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3008.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 87C8B1C00089 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 21:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.6.65]) by mwinf3008.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 61EFF1C00084 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 21:03:57 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070909190357401.61EFF1C00084@mwinf3008.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <002201c7f314$3a48bf10$0d00000a@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <20070905210445.47ec6573@lurcher.twatt.local> <009801c7f015$16b3cc90$0d00000a@AGB> <001e01c7f189$0d8bd570$0e00000a@AGB> <003f01c7f19a$37f1f590$0e00000a@AGB> <861404727.20070908002340@gmx.de> <008c01c7f19f$58c1abd0$0e00000a@AGB> <519019685.20070908003918@gmx.de> <000c01c7f1a2$1e015bf0$0e00000a@AGB> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:04:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Dual mode data test QPSK31(503.2) + PSKAM10 (503.1) Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 45 Thanks for reports on last two test's, looks like psk could be used as a qso mode on the band , even with existing power levels , for these tests im estimating a peak erp in the region of 50 mW maximum According to the 'printed word' the PSKAM10 mode is supposed to be quite robust .. As a simple 'head to head' I'll run the two modes in parallel. sunset till midnight as before , each stream will be -3db on stn peak output >From a short test last night , noticed what appeared to be 'selective fading' something I'd not expected ? Carrier frequency (from software) 503.2 = QPSK31 USB.....Digipan 503.1= PSKAM10 ....Multipsk ver 4.4 USB Tnx Graham ..