Message-ID: <001e01c80298$13ce2260$0400000a@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <20070928231558.5859080d@lurcher.twatt.local><20070928231905.7401b3a9@lurcher.twatt.local><002c01c80226$c751aa90$0400000a@AGB> <20070929013639.7f192874@lurcher.twatt.local>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:55:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: IO83FK - 502.9
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Ok John,

Fine on that, well have a look back in you files , about   9 till midnigh 
i saved one file at 21:12 , shows a qsy , hf which resulted in the carriers 
dropping out ..
the bham plots also show the strenght changing with frequency, but still 
inside the 'normal' qsb time  of  60/90 seconds . Stopped the test after 
about 1 hour and set the cw beacon running.

Next time , ill see if i can get a signal top/middle and bottom band .. see 
if changes the pattern ?


Tnx

G ..



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Pumford-Green GM4SLV" <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: LF: IO83FK - 502.9


> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:24:54 +0100
> "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I'll have to  check the text file ... should be  io83lk .... might of
>> been sendiong  io83fk   .....
>
>
> Hi Graham,LF
>
> My mistake! It was IO83LK... That'll teach me for trying to read CW
> visually and then remembering it in order to write an email.
>
>
>> Had a short run tonight looking at selective fading , using your band
>> display ,Ran  3 carriers spaced  100 hz appart , just looking at the
>> amplitude change at your end .. , some   intresting  captures , looks
>> like the frequency has something to  do with  the path, not so marked
>> at birmingham .. id noted something a while ago, when running  two
>> data streams , testing with gary, the higher frequency one did not
>> show on your site, till some time after the lower one .. odd
>
>
>
> I will have a look through the captures and see if I can spot the
> effects you mention. If you need any pics I can send them down. Each 5
> minute capture is stored here.
>
>
> Wonder if the auroral conditions played any part in the propagation?
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1036 - Release Date: 
> 9/28/2007 15:40
>
>