X-GM-THRID: 1244750902519636876 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.87.11 with SMTP id k11cs226012wxb; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.205.7 with SMTP id c7mr2889818hug.1187111985854; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5si8828302nfh.2007.08.14.10.19.41; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IKzz0-00079v-Mc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:15:06 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IKzz0-00079m-7Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:15:06 +0100 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IKzyy-0005ss-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:15:06 +0100 Received: from lurcher.twatt.local (lurcher.twatt.local [127.0.1.1]) by lurcher.twatt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5265DA4CC for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:16:41 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:16:40 +0100 From: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20070814181640.6c234777@lurcher.twatt.local> In-Reply-To: <46C1A991.50309@yahoo.com> References: <46C1A991.50309@yahoo.com> Organization: The Gammy Bird X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=0.234 Subject: Re: LF: QRP Experiments Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 977 On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:09:37 -0500 WE0H wrote: > Hi John, > > What distance was that QSO with Finbar & what antennas do you guys > run? Lightning static is causing us lots of trouble here in the USA > on 505kc. It is usually 40/9 noise floor as we keep getting > thunderstorms across the country every night. Hi Mike, Finbar and I are approx 420 miles apart. I'm in the Shetland Islands at IP90gg and he's in Northern Ireland, I think his locator is IO64ix. The path between us is partly sea (as you'd imagine - with me being on a remote island) and partly over the highlands of Scotland. This distance doesn't seem very far, given the distances you guys have to work with, but we're running fairly low TX powers - down to 1W or less - with very low ERPs - we're limited by the license to 100mW ERP. My antenna is a vertical wire 11m high (held up by a fibreglass mast from Spiderbeam) topped by 4 sloping capacity hat wires of approx 3.5m length, tuned against a mess of radials with approx 500uH of inductance on a home made variometer. The lightning noise has been quite bad over here lately, as the propagation lengthens at night the noise from storms over Europe comes in, and crashes around at S8-9. Despite that Finbar and I have managed a QSO 6 nights of the last 7 at 11pm local time. I had a QSO last night with G3OLB in Devon - a distance of 654 miles - and about as far as you can go in the UK. Finbar runs (as far as I know) a top loaded vertical - with 4 long top wires and a rather higher vertical section than me, held aloft by a versatower, over a much more extensive set of radials and earth rods. I'm not sure of the dimensions He was receiving me on a 1m amplified loop antenna, or a 120m low lying "mini-beverage" though - so his efficient TX antenna has no bearing on his ability to receive my flea power signal! The static crashes were much lower last night, only peaking around S4-5, which greatly improved readability at the lower power levels. I have tested a way of reducing my power in a controlled/calibrated way down to 100mW or less today, so hope to try some real QRP tests tonight, as long as the QRN stays at bay. Looking forward to the autumn season when the thunderstorms die out and conditions improve, then we might be in for some cross pond - cross band QSOs? (By cross band I mean between our differing 500kHz allocations - we have 501-504kHz, you have higher, around 505?) Hope this helps, and feel free to email me direct if you want more info. Cheers, John GM4SLV Shetland Is. IOTA EU-012