X-GM-THRID: 1243525002459918446 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.87.11 with SMTP id k11cs149979wxb; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.182.1 with SMTP id e1mr1232970buf.1185991146629; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d2si1026054nfc.2007.08.01.10.58.58; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IGIN7-0004Qo-Ud for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:52:33 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IGIN7-0004Qf-Ce for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:52:33 +0100 Received: from smtpout0182.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.182] helo=n068.sc1.he.tucows.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IGIN4-0005LZ-Eo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:52:33 +0100 Received: from g3kev (62.252.235.161) by n068.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 46A9389E0005D459 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:52:24 +0000 Message-ID: <006e01c7d464$b6b98c60$a1ebfc3e@g3kev> From: "hamilton mal" To: References: <006b01c7d3ba$78370d00$0300a8c0@lark> <1185971099.4593.67.camel@admin> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:51:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1499 bob om With your Mummy's permission please let us all know what your professional electronic communications qualifications happen to be if any before engaging with your sort of observations I would suggest you do some resarch about the persons that you are addressing. Please let me and others know when convenient then I for one could enter into a proper debate. I likewise will supply you with my professional credentials. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Savage" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:24 PM Subject: Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:33 +0100, Alan Melia wrote: > > > > One final question why did it matter that it sounded like bedlam in this > > country today? I though everyone was trying to see whether there signal > > could be heard in Spain, not in the UK. I havent seen any complaint from > > Jose-Manual yet ! > > > > I think some awareness of the nature of this reflector needs to be taken > > into account, before you let out all your histrionics. You could be sinking > > a awfull lot of work by several people to get this allocation at > > all.....dont mess it up ! > > > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > > > > > > > > Well said Alan, > > I was very pleased to see three test signals running over here in the > West yesterday, my experiments with a short AE were greatly enhanced by > the fact there was some activity on an otherwise barren 501 - 504 > spectrum. I know for a fact that there are other stations in the West > who would like to see more test signal activity within this allocation, > it is most useful during the daytime (I don't do night watches anymore). > We rely very much on GW3UEP and GW4HXO for these daytime signals for > test purposes. If you have a decent receiver then a multitude of signals > in close proximity to each other is not a problem. > > The allocation 501 - 504 kHz is for experimentation not for DXCC or > weekend contest working, but there seems to be a small group of > unprofessional people on this reflector behaving rather like small boys > and trying to lay down totally unnecessary rules. I understand they > killed a lot of interest in 136kHz by this sort of nonsense. To them I > would say "Mummy's calling ....go home and play with your train sets". > (With apologies to any serious railway enthusiasts). > > Bob > > GW3LTX > > > >