X-GM-THRID: 1244948390487685842 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.25.11 with SMTP id 11cs457706wxy; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.172.20 with SMTP id u20mr653915hue.1187275305387; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k10si919668nfh.2007.08.16.07.41.40; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ILgTi-0007NL-5S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:37:38 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ILgTh-0007NC-Ow for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:37:37 +0100 Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.141]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ILgTd-00040R-Rd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:37:37 +0100 Received: from [82.68.18.174] (helo=acer5gi5q0ubzj) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILgTZ-0005cb-MQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:37:29 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:38:20 +0100 Message-ID: <000201c7e013$1a798340$0b01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev> X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.68.18.174] X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.003,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.166 Subject: LF: RE: 600 V 160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 228 Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute measurement of the noise floor on each band. Incidentally, has anyone done some noise floor measurements on 136kHz now that the Rugby LORAN has gone? 73 John, G3WKL