X-GM-THRID: 1238798748720296233 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs321676hue; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr4730248ugg.1181524767689; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f8si5426067nfh.2007.06.10.18.19.25; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HxYVz-0002YK-NF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:16:15 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HxYVz-0002YB-5E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:16:15 +0100 Received: from bay0-omc3-s14.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.214]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxYVx-00040f-Tb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:16:15 +0100 Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.11.247]) by bay0-omc3-s14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:15:46 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:15:46 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 207.46.11.254 by by124fd.bay124.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:15:42 GMT X-Originating-IP: [69.33.149.2] X-Originating-Email: [hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com] X-Sender: hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Laurence KL1X" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Bcc: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:15:42 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2007 01:15:46.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A1C7560:01C7ABC6] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0 Subject: RE: LF: MF Still on shifp? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1359 Well as far as the Chinese and Korean ship builders they (as far as Ive seen over the past couple of years ) are not putting in any MF (500KHz) equipment - GMDSS area dependant whether VHF or HF is installed but nothing on 500Khz et al. What we put in ships/tankers/platforms has been or more than a passing interest. Bcasts on 500Khz area continue in china from xsg on 522.5KHz.. Changing back to LF - Ill be in San Antonio Texas for the next 2 days and may have the Singapore (sic) grabber running. Any USA or Eu signals welcomed. Laurence KL1X/5 Marriot NW 10th Floor San Antonio >From: "Andy Talbot" >Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >CC: "Linda Holtby" >Subject: LF: MF Still on shifp? >Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 18:32:41 +0100 > >Yesterday I was watching two large cruise ships sail down Southampton water >(P&O ships, 'Artemis' and 'Aurora'). Both had a large wire antennas >strung between the masts, and in the case of Artemis this extended down at >each end close to bow and stern; and there may even have been two wire >side-by-side on this ship. A really long antenna. I'm not sure of the >length of these ships, but they could be 200 metres (ish), so even at the >bottom end of HF these are electrically long-wires. >Of course, the pair on Artemis, if I saw them correctly, could even be >phased for really high gain at HF - a Rhombic perhaps? > >Does anyone know if large modern ships still have MF, or a serious HF >presence? Or are the wire antenna(s ?) just there to hang flags from? Or >are they not even antennas, but just used for supporting decorations. > >Artemis also had a mass of big whips on the bow, which I assume were base >tuned HF - the normal VHF whips were practically invisible beside them. >Aurora presumably had something similar, but they weren't obvious. > >Needless to say, each ship had two large VSAT radomes, and three or four >smaller Inmarsat (and other satcom?) antennas. > >Andy G4JNT _________________________________________________________________ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01