X-GM-THRID: 1236818290626995826 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs122914hue; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.92.9 with SMTP id u9mr1314853ugl.1179523176802; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o30si2960004ugd.2007.05.18.14.19.34; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Hp9og-0007Bn-7X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 22:16:50 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Hp9of-0007Bc-Mh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 22:16:49 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hp9oe-0004qm-5g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 22:16:49 +0100 Received: from g3xaq.demon.co.uk ([80.176.129.138]) by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1Hp9od-000OsJ-K5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 21:16:47 +0000 Message-ID: <7DftOACmdhTGFwNm@g3xaq.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:15:18 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Alan Ibbetson References: <008001c7998e$b3f608c0$34556a58@wgt01> In-Reply-To: <008001c7998e$b3f608c0$34556a58@wgt01> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Turnpike/6.04-S () X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.672 Subject: Re: LF: Re: G3XAQ on 502.0 KHz Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1672 Hello Gary, When you say "see anything", do you mean you are expecting me to be using a computer based transmission? I'm actually using ordinary morse, currently at about 12 wpm. I wonder if you can "hear" me? I got a 569 SWL report from G3XVL in Ipswich, so I seem to be getting out OK. Best wishes, Alan In message <008001c7998e$b3f608c0$34556a58@wgt01>, Gary - G4WGT writes >Congratulations Alan, > >I can't see anything of you up here in Lancashire but there is a signal >keeps showing on Dave's (G3YXM) 500 KHz grabber on 502.000 KHz, could >it be you ? > >Go to :- > >http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/ > >73 > >Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > >http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/ >Web site updated 07/05/2007 > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Ibbetson" > >To: >Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:38 PM >Subject: LF: G3XAQ on 502.0 KHz > > >>I have today got my 500KHz station on the air. I am located near >>Canterbury, locator JO01md. Here are some technical details. >> >> The aerial is an inverted-L with a 15m vertical and a 35m horizontal >>section. This was originally my top band aerial. I have added a 1mH >>end loading coil (460 turns of 0.5mm enamelled wire on a 38mm OD white >>poly waste pipe occupying 275mm of winding length). The loading coil >>is 14.7m from the far end. I trimmed the 14.7m for resonance at >>502KHz because I wanted a roughly resonant aerial to simplfy feeding, >>but from the way the resonance wanders about as the wind blows I'm >>not convinced this was such a great idea. Standard formulae suggest >>this aerial has a radiation resistance of almost exactly 1 ohm. >> >> The aerial is end fed against a reasonable earth system comprising a >>20m x 20m mat of stock fencing with the sections crimped together. I >>also have about twenty 30m radials. On top band I can work east coast >>US easily with 100W and I have worked VK and W6 with 400W. I was >>quite surprised (well, p****d off) to measure the return loss of the >>aerial system at 502KHz as 22dB. This suggests the input resistance >>is a little over 40 ohms, almost all of which is earth loss >>resistance! So much for my "killer" top band earth mat. >> >> I am using a link-coupled series tuned ATU with a loaded Q of 7 >>placed at the base of the aerial to get the SWR very close to 1:1. >>The 2:1 SWR bandwidth of the aerial system is less than 2 KHz (1KHz >>either side of resonance). >> >> I have built a QRP transmitter using an ECL82 triode pentode, as >>popularised by G0UPL and others. Output is 4 watts. Cathode keying >>with a small choke and 0.5uF capacitor gives a clean 3msec rise and >>fall on the keying waveform, but the un-neutralised PA has a backwave >>that is only 40dB down. I've added a "half wave" filter after the pi >>tank in an effort to avoid QRMing MW broadcast stations. Harmonics >>are over 50dB down. >> >> The main HF station FT1000MP Mk5 seems just OK on 500KHz. Band noise >>is S 1 in a 500Hz passband on the meter. >> >> The rig is crystal controlled on 502.0KHz, so you know where to find >>me! All I need now is some stations to work. "Can you hear me, >>Mother?". >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> Alan G3XAQ >> alan@g3xaq.demon.co.uk >> >> >> > > > -- Cheers, Alan G3XAQ alan@g3xaq.demon.co.uk