X-GM-THRID: 1237155662097393671 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.1 with SMTP id u1cs273296hue; Tue, 22 May 2007 07:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.28.9 with SMTP id f9mr609637ugj.1179844464066; Tue, 22 May 2007 07:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 53si1758806ugn.2007.05.22.07.34.20; Tue, 22 May 2007 07:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HqVMs-0006zD-Nq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:29:42 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HqVMs-0006z4-9e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:29:42 +0100 Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.240.42]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HqVMo-0000kQ-Qb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:29:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585841D7BE3 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtps01 (octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.71]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC4C1D7B3F for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:29:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtps01 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtps01 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9B72E68CC; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.be (pc-10-33-165-177.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [10.33.165.177]) by smtps01 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31832E68CB for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:29:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:31:57 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <88d2415e0705220715u327d7c9ar38fed036271fcdf7@mail.gmail.co m> References: <88d2415e0705220715u327d7c9ar38fed036271fcdf7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20070522142930.E31832E68CB@smtps01> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500kHz Distance Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2864 >I get about 30 ohms resistance on 136 and about 15 ohms on 500. So I dont need It would be interesting to get some more values on groundloss (or better environmental losses) on 500 kHz. Even better 136 kHz compared to 500 kHz. So those who are not (yet) active on 600m know what to expect. 73, Rik ON7YD Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm