Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:52:51 +0200
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: Dick Rollema <dickrollema@casema.nl>
In-Reply-To: <000e01c7947d$aa5ef080$ae124452@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
References: <000e01c7947d$aa5ef080$ae124452@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20070512105231.D39334AB3@mta-fe.casema.nl>
Subject: Re: LF: RE: 500 kHz license refused in  the Netherlands
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Thanks John for the hint. I will pass your message on to PA0SHY.

73, Dick, PA0SE

At 12:09 12-5-2007, you wrote:
>Dick, sorry to hear that, but in a way it's understandable.
>
>Can I suggest that you contact Sioerd, PA0SHY, VERON HF Manager, and bring
>his attention to the posting by Ulrich, DK4VW, DARC HF Manager, on the IARU
>Region 1 HF Manager's reflector asking for support for the proposal by
>BNetzA (The German Administration) to have the matter of an Amateur band at
>600m put on the agenda for WRC2011. The BNetzA paper can be downloaded from
>the HF Manager's reflector's files folder.
>
>BNetZA are looking for other national administrations to support their
>proposal at the final WRC07 preparatory meeting later this month.  Ulrich,
>DK4VW, DARC HF Manager has done much of the work on encouraging the BNetzA
>to put forward this proposal and is looking for the support of other
>national society HF Managers to contact their licensing administration and
>give BNetzA their support.  It's my understanding that Ofcom (UK) and the
>Greek PTT have so far pledged to support this proposal.
>
>The workings of WRC are quite complex and seem slow. Before one can get
>anything agreed one has to get the issue put on the agenda and normally to
>have completed some studies.  Whilst the agenda for the WRC2011 was set in
>outline a few years ago, there is a formal agenda item at WRC07 to consider
>any last minute additions to the agenda.  To get the matter of a 600m
>Amateur Band onto the agenda for WRC2011 has been the main focus of activity
>by the IARU Region 1 500kHz Working Group and is supported by
>representatives from Regions 2 and 3.  The work of the three beacons, the US
>and more recently UK experimental access all contributes knowledge that
>might be seen as "studies"; certainly we will be drawing together findings
>on propagation and harmonisation with other co- and adjacent-band users.
>
>Others reading this e-mail might consider trying to get their national
>administration to support the call for this being an agenda item at WRC2011.
>If so the best action is to contact your national society (HF Manager) and
>see if they are taking the appropriate action.  I will be happy to provide
>contact details if these are not know; please send me a direct e-mail if
>this is required (g3wkl@btinternet.com).
>
>73 John, G3WKL
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dick Rollema
>Sent: 10 May 2007 09:45
>To: LF-Group
>Subject: LF: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands
>
>
>To All from PA0SE,
>
>Our radio agency just has informed me that my application for
>permission to use the 500 kHz band has been refused.
>The arguments are:
>1. The band has not internationally been allocated as an amateurband
>and also not in The Netherlands
>2. The band is still being used for emergency, urgent and safety traffic.
>
>It has therefore been decided that for the time being the band will
>not be available for experiments by amateurs.
>
>A disappointing decision, but I had more or less expected this
>knowing how our agency operates.
>
>73, Dick, PA0SE