X-GM-THRID: 1236088949262680120 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs162405hue; Sat, 12 May 2007 02:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.99.1 with SMTP id b1mr847515ugm.1178961668051; Sat, 12 May 2007 02:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1si278139uge.2007.05.12.02.21.05; Sat, 12 May 2007 02:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HmnjB-00011b-F2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:17:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HmnjB-00011S-1L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:17:25 +0100 Received: from cas-mta2-fe.casema.nl ([83.80.1.24] helo=mta-fe.casema.nl) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hmnj8-0004Mn-2F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 10:17:25 +0100 Received: from localhost (cas-filter2.mgmt.casema.nl [10.42.32.69]) by mta-fe.casema.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF7354C0 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 11:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mta-fe.casema.nl ([10.42.32.24]) by localhost (cas-filter2.mgmt.casema.nl [10.42.32.211]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with ESMTP id 14693-04 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 11:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from crazypeecee.casema.nl (5356F8BC.cable.casema.nl [83.86.248.188]) by mta-fe.casema.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBA354BB for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 11:17:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:17:36 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Dick Rollema Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20070512091716.8BBA354BB@mta-fe.casema.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at casema.nl X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 kHz license refused in the Netherlands Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1681 Thanks Warren for the info. But I'm afraid our radio agency will not be impressed nor willing to change their view. 73, Dick, PA0SE At 17:35 11-5-2007, you wrote: > > * The band is national and international not an amateur band > > * The band is still used for emergency, urgent and safety messages > > are just as valid for Germany, UK, Sweden and USA > > Dick, in the USA we were refused use of 495-505 on the basis > that it is allocated to maritime emergency service. >It is apparent that the allocation tables have not caught up with >the reality that nobody uses these frequencies anymore, and further >no one even monitors these frequencies for emergency traffic >anymore. However no bureaucrat will take a risk for what is >essentially an amateur experiment. > >We got around that by accepting a band from 505-510 kHz, which is >not designated for emergency traffic. > > I have a new application in requesting 505-510 and 510-515kHz with > 200 watts erp and many more modes including ssb. It will take time > and patience to see the results of this application. > > >-- >73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23/WE2XEB/2 >FN42hi >http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- >From: Dick Rollema > > Walter, DI2AG/DJ2LF wrote: > > : > > >Dear Dick, > > > sorry about the bad news. But - how about asking your radio agency > > >for a test- and research permit? > > Dear Walter, > > > > That is exactly what I did, with accent on the research of skywave > > propagation and on the reliability of daytime communication using > small power. > > > > It is queer that the reasons for refusal: > > * The band is national and international not an amateur band > > * The band is still used for emergency, urgent and safety messages > > are just as valid for Germany, UK, Sweden and USA and in these > > countries this is not a reason for refusing permission to use the > > band for research and experiments. > > I had also stated I wanted the permission for a limited period, > > preferably one year. So the agency could always revoke the permission > > after that period. > > But being a small country our administration is always very > > cautious and not inclined to be at the forefront on subjects that > > have not been agreed upon between a large number of countries in CEPT > > or similar organisations. > > > > But who knows what the future may bring. Our 136 kHz permission also > > came rather late. > > > > 73, Dick, PA0SE > > > > > >