Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de
References:<004e01c79610$0592d320$fe79a8c0@PCVONWALTER> 
 <46495B84.16677.2783A9@dave.davesergeant.com>
In-Reply-To:<46495B84.16677.2783A9@dave.davesergeant.com>
To:  <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 15 May 2007 08:52 GMT
Message-ID: <1HnslU-0KYGdU0@fwd31.sul.t-online.de>
Subject: Re: LF: Rugby - Anthorn
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
 Charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Dear all,

I do not have a former log entry how strong MSF may have been before on
60 kHz here in eastern Bavaria (JN68GN), but today it is just one S unit
lower than HBN on 75 kHz, also employing an active aerial.

73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB

"Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com> schrieb:
> On 14 May 2007 at 23:50, Alberto di Bene wrote:
> 
> > The recent move of the 60 kHz time/frequency reference station from
> > Rugby to Anthorn has considerably contributed to the diminution of RF
> > pollution, at least here where I live... :-) Rugby was S9 on average,
> > using the Roelof active whip, while Anthorn rarely exceeds S3...
> > 
> > I thought I had to report this change of signal strength, even if it
> > probably is of no interest for the majority of you... :-)
> > 
> > 73  Alberto  I2PHD
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Althorn is definitely a lot down in strength here in IO91PJ compared 
> with Rugby, and I know they had predicted this would be the case as 
> it is significantly further away. But if it is that far down in Italy 
> then maybe their new antennas are not getting out as well as the old 
> ones. Occasionally my MSF clock loses the signal.
> 
> 73 Dave G3YMC
> 
> http://www.davesergeant.com
> 
> 
>