X-GM-THRID: 1237237638150559099 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.1 with SMTP id u1cs337033hue; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr1705710ugg.1179963296062; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e1si3592555ugf.2007.05.23.16.34.52; Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) DomainKey-Status: good (test mode) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Hr0Hs-0005Ur-Ti for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 00:30:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Hr0Hs-0005Ui-DB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 00:30:36 +0100 Received: from smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.63]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hr0Hr-0007gB-NZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 00:30:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 13559 invoked from network); 23 May 2007 23:30:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=eSvzLJ6++RJjZ0dKVP2ewAdLUlZWPsTl7CDzRTKTPsSBCSdFa2YKxlIEQ8ZkYib1anYw/8SzT3CpgYiJIXfIZYLkTjYDDucNFbOO5om5gkFQKV8g2tQ8VQrYQhSce1AmmVb60sru6Axctrg4v4Xw1vv2jNBle/UBGun3hcz+8co= ; Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@213.122.37.61 with login) by smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 May 2007 23:30:29 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: _prEX2UVM1kmRtXTI8rpKl0nMr8SbNfXVSuTIrq7LOTMJXzmR4Mkfe7zGz8zfdMIgedNhnURDg-- Message-ID: <003101c79d92$6361fa60$0300a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <003f01c79d31$622811e0$0300a8c0@lark> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:31:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500 propagation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2660 Thanks Alan, that sounds like a "not proven" verdict. 0800z is a bit early to be seeing any enhancement if there was any 1100 to 1300z would be the most favoured time if it works the same way as 136kHz. Never mind there will be plenty of other chances to test that idea as the geomag storms become more frequent during the upswing to the next Max. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Alan Ibbetson To: Sent: 23 May 2007 22:38 Subject: Re: LF: 500 propagation > G3KEV and G3VTT were their usual strength around 9am (0800Z). Nobody was > around when I called CQ a few times in the middle of the day. Despite > heavy QRN this evening, G3VTT was his usual strength over our short path > distance. Nobody else heard. > > Regards, > > Alan > > In message <003f01c79d31$622811e0$0300a8c0@lark>, Alan Melia > writes > >Hi all, there was a geomagnetic event this morning and whilst small it is > >likely to be extended to tomorrow as well. We have not really had such an > >event yet whilst 500k permits have been active. I would be interested to > >know from regular users and listeners whether the signal levels are enhanced > >over your expectations (particularly around the middle of the day) or as I > >suspect are weaker. 500k is different to 136k where the current conditions > >could boost daytime signals slightly. I also think night-time signals may be > >slightly weaker, similar to 136k. > > > >Thanks and Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Alan G3XAQ > alan@g3xaq.demon.co.uk > >