X-GM-THRID: 1234277115291746248 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.35.22.8 with SMTP id z8cs166467pyi; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.253.17 with SMTP id a17mr3036438ugi.1177100912001; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b35si7256949ugd.2007.04.20.13.28.29; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HezfZ-0005fF-JE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:25:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HezfZ-0005f6-4G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:25:25 +0100 Received: from smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.62]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HezfX-0007vT-7I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:25:24 +0100 Received: (qmail 59294 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2007 20:25:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dave) (dsergeant@btinternet.com@86.134.122.42 with login) by smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2007 20:25:16 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: D12A3kMVM1mutu0pgdVI3bewOk7i._1ZbwzbB00p2zrTPa4q.nX1AgoX.AzjVIlKJwSQWIfCmvQR4ahZ73Pu3ZXUjXwPqsGUQ0Va4BkoYpRua3OY From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:25:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <46292FCA.30957.3369F7D@dave.davesergeant.com> In-reply-to: <001301c78383$fdb8f560$92e4fc3e@g3kev> References: <001301c78383$fdb8f560$92e4fc3e@g3kev> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500 RX Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2475 On 20 Apr 2007 at 19:41, hamilton mal wrote: > Hi All > I find the Datong UC1 up converter vy good on 500 khz. I use the 144 > mhz IF and a IC 746 with narrow cw filter. The converter has a tuned > rf input and this enables the system to be peaked to the signal area > of interest and avoids breakthrough fm BC stns even with large > antennas. 73 de Mal/G3KEV/IO94SH > > Another UC/1 user here Mal, although I use its 28MHz output into my K2. That shows up one of its weaknesses, in that the 116MHz downconverter crystal is not too stable and is hard to get spot on so I find the calibration is sometimes 100Hz out... I seem to have a relatively low noise level here (though does vary a bit) and no problems from BC station blocking. Just been listening to Colin G3VTT working Finbar GI4DPE and while they were exchanging 319 and such reports I was copying them both very well, peaking 589 but with the inevitable QSB. Finbar seemed a very good signal tonight, almost as strong as yourself. So I guess it does show that people's receivers and noise levels vary a lot. NOV'd listener at the moment, but not for long... 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com