Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <4612F193.6070501@internode.on.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:30:11 +0800
From: "David, VK6DI" <vk6di@internode.on.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <006501c775da$f351e7a0$0401010a@acer3f31164f8b>
In-Reply-To: <006501c775da$f351e7a0$0401010a@acer3f31164f8b>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: ZM2E RX'd in VK6:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Mike McAlevey wrote:
> thanks for the captures of reception of ZM2E. I don't recall our 
> signals having been captured in VK6 before. Any sign of an amateur LF 
> allocation over there?
Hi Mike,

To the best of my knowledge nobody in VK6 has ever really listened 
seriously on 137 kHz in the past.  Certainly RX'ing a signal on 137 on 
my first attempt was a very satisfying event for me!

The WIA has applied for a 505 ~ 515 kHz MF allocation - 
http://www.wia.org.au/news/2007/20070214-01.php  600M seems to be a band 
with some interesting possibilities.

I understand that for VK LF TX operations a special experimental license 
would be required.  A small number of such licenses have been granted in 
the past.  I am unaware of any recent VK activity on LF however.

Thanks for helping provide the signal from ZM2E!   It was a worthwhile 
exercise.

Regards,

David, VK6DI, OF88cd.

VK6DI Captures: http://tinyurl.com/rzzsj