X-GM-THRID: 1232258499491870573 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.73.6 with SMTP id a6cs289747wal; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr1183446ugg.1175173282453; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 55si2084284ugq.2007.03.29.06.01.19; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HWu6d-00023R-J8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:55 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HWu6d-00023I-7I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:55 +0100 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWu6a-0003uX-Oa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:55 +0100 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070329125147.KPJN3103.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:47 +0100 Received: from mikedennison ([82.15.237.0]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070329125146.SLSH29112.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@mikedennison> for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:46 +0100 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:51:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <460BC469.10355.15453DF@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: DFCW split Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2652 Can anyone tell me whether there is any agreement on the frequency difference between the dot and dash when using DFCW? Obviously it is different for different dot lengths, but it should be possible to recommend an approximate shift to a newcomer, perhaps in the form: magic number divided by the dot length in seconds = Hertz Mike, G3XDV ==========