X-GM-THRID: 1230837501432379640 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.73.3 with SMTP id a3cs215542wal; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.133.8 with SMTP id k8mr2682865qbn.1173818114516; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17si592430qba.2007.03.13.13.35.10; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HRDdq-000705-7M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:42 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HRDdp-0006zw-Kd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:41 +0000 Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.141]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRDdo-0002PX-HV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:41 +0000 Received: from [82.68.18.174] (helo=acer5gi5q0ubzj) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRDdn-0007AI-Jw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:39 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:30:42 -0000 Message-ID: <02ef01c765ae$79522550$f439fea9@acer5gi5q0ubzj> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-reply-to: <8bf118410703130819n576c0c26t11a38427a2008a8e@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.68.18.174] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: RE: [500] 500 bandplan? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02F0_01C765AE.79522550" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2265 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02F0_01C765AE.79522550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or = so ago that made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings. = I don't think the suggestion would work in all cases, so I would suggest = that we try and put [500], so that people can setup a filter. I' ve done it = on this e-mail as an example =20 I'm happy to leave it to others to decide about a bandplan - just a word = of caution about digimodes - for modes such as PSK31 please make sure that = the dial frequency chosen doesn't allow any significant energy to be = transmitted outside the 501 - 504kHz band! =20 73 John, G3WKL =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dave Pick Sent: 13 March 2007 15:20 To: LF Group Subject: LF: 500 bandplan? Someone had to ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?". Finbar is beaconing down the bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been = trying for QSOs near the top because my local noises seem to congregate near 501kHz. Do we want to suggest areas for different activities like on = 136?=20 In fact do we need to set up a Google / Yahoo group (or is there already = one going) for European 500k activity to be discussed or is this the place = to do it? Questions questions! Discuss... Dave. --=20 G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK=20 ------=_NextPart_000_02F0_01C765AE.79522550 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I'm=20 not keen on another reflector, but someone made a comment a week or so = ago that=20 made sense, which was to prefix the title of 500kHz postings.  I = don't=20 think the suggestion would work in all cases, so I would suggest that we = try and=20 put [500], so that people can setup a filter.  I' ve done it on = this e-mail=20 as an example
 
I'm=20 happy to leave it to others to decide about a bandplan - just a word of = caution=20 about digimodes - for modes such as PSK31 please make sure that the dial = frequency chosen doesn't allow any significant energy to be transmitted = outside=20 the 501 - 504kHz band!
 
73=20 John, G3WKL
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]=20 On Behalf Of Dave Pick
Sent: 13 March 2007 = 15:20
To:=20 LF Group
Subject: LF: 500 = bandplan?

Someone had to=20 ask the question "Do we need a band-plan?".

Finbar is beaconing = down the=20 bottom, which seem OK to me, I've been trying for QSOs near the top = because my=20 local noises seem to congregate near 501kHz. Do we want to suggest areas = for=20 different activities like on 136?
In fact do we need to set up a = Google /=20 Yahoo group (or is there already one going) for European 500k activity = to be=20 discussed or is this the place to do it?

Questions=20 questions!

Discuss...

Dave.

--
G3YXM IO92BK = Birmingham=20 UK ------=_NextPart_000_02F0_01C765AE.79522550--