X-GM-THRID: 1230823090997090563 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.73.3 with SMTP id a3cs200946wal; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.211.16 with SMTP id n16mr2453415qbq.1173810734826; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d2si3941393qbc.2007.03.13.11.32.12; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HRBj9-00069v-4m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:28:03 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HRBj8-00069m-Kf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:28:02 +0000 Received: from mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRBj5-0000FE-PX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:28:02 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAEqK9kXUSnInk2dsb2JhbACKJ4R0AgEBBw4MHg Received: from 88-106-93-106.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.106.93.106]:1698 helo=wgt01) by mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1HRBis-000AuF-QE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:27:46 +0000 Message-ID: <007501c7659d$4e3e8720$6a5d6a58@wgt01> From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: References: <8bf118410703130819n576c0c26t11a38427a2008a8e@mail.gmail.com> <001701c7658e$ae06ef80$0300a8c0@lark> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:27:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.332 Subject: LF: Re: 500 bandplan? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3935 Hi Alan & All, I agree with the majority comments so far, no band plan yet, and continue to use this reflector. By the way, transmitter nearly completed. 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" My vote goes for the old favourite of "doing nothing 'til it bites us!" ....and a definite "NO" to another reflector ! Plenty of room (bandwidth?) on this one. ----- End of Original Message -----