X-GM-THRID: 1222833097826455481
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.56.11 with SMTP id e11cs855270wxa;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.92.1 with SMTP id u1mr183244ugl.1166205133553;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i39si4648431ugd.2006.12.15.09.52.12;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1GvH6I-0008Mt-MT
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:44:02 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.35] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1GvH6I-0008Mk-CC
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:44:02 +0000
Received: from m11.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.74])
	by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <riese-k3djc@juno.com>)
	id 1GvH6E-0004IW-VX
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:44:02 +0000
Received: from m11.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by m11.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABC2FZW6A4C6K6A
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> (sender <riese-k3djc@juno.com>);
	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:42:52 -0800 (PST)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: yokUgcxCbtTP7XLrpefewPD0vuiu25ZFBkPZ3nYhNUfiRBSlXmsDQA==
Received: (from riese-k3djc@juno.com) 
 by m11.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id L9NAD9Z2; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:42:44 PST
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:39:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20061215.124224.3960.1.riese-k3djc@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.49
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: riese-k3djc@juno.com
X-ContentStamp: 7:3:1869285494
X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m11.lax.untd.com|riese-k3djc@juno.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001
Subject: Re: LF: Has the ionosphere died
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 3611

Its the end of the world as we know it,, and I feel fine

Bob K3DJC


> I've just checked on the 5MHz beacon monitoring in the lab here, and 
> there
> is nothing from any of them.   The two closest  to me (GB3RAL and 
> GB3WES)
> showed a few peaks during the night, and the furthest GB3ORK was 
> reasonable
> this morning.  But any trace of that has disappeared into the noise 
> as well
> now.
> 
> Has the ionosphere died - can it be repaired - where is am. Radio 
> going - do
> we all go to sat comms - how about EME ?
> 
> :-)
> 
> Andy  G4JNT
>