Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <00c601c70db7$28cb5920$6801a8c0@Radio>
From: "J. Allen" <vy1ja@northwestel.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:51:11 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Perhaps narrow bandwidth?  
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hello Friends,

Perhaps someone might try setting their Argo reception for 60 second dots to 
narrow the bandwith for 05:30-06:30 and increase the chance of reception, 
just in case it is my signal and it needs a little help.

This evening (your tomorrrow morning) I plan to switch to sending, 
"JA_JA_JA" at QRSS60, on ~13778.65, with my whole callsign at normal CW 
speeds every half hour.  I will continue to beacon that way until about 
07:30 and then switch back to the entire callsign only at QRSS60.

Would it be better to go to 120 second dits for the reduced bandwidth?

Would a second instance of Argo run at the same time reliably?  Could it be 
set up to watch for my signal and not interfere with the normal operation of 
the grabbers?

J.

VY1JA