Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
DomainKey-Status: bad (test mode)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;
  b=chYwFJC0ZT+Wc2PVMLNK1B9ldlWLMnvT0BIzQ+bYgV0N5dl0agnytAa0qBkKbanJLqzeJvQMeUgy9y2QQD+eTAnKA2+oDMVtKXdE6LOHmdAhK0y2gz4yNAG4tL4U1MVf+CmCQpY+Fqoy/CXbRMU5YuiPMyzrJZ7tFEIVbfAUqcs=  ;
Message-ID: <001a01c70a50$294074e0$0300a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <55rtb3$6ojkau@mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:56:15 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Frequency error.
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Gary, if you use your RX like I do and it never gets switched
off......there is a little problem I found with this. The AOR 7030 has 2.56
Hz steps but 10Hz indicaton. It sits on frequency for months on end and I
never need to adjust the cal on my waterfalls. But switch the power off and
when it comes back on (even with the tuning "locked") it jumps to the
nearest 10Hz step. I guess this is because the memory only stores the last
frequency to that resolution, not to the tuning step size. I suppose having
tuned in the frequency on the dail you should switch off and then on again
before doing the waterfall calibration so ensuring you are always exactly on
a 10Hz point.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: LF (Rsgb LF Group) <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 17 November 2006 10:56
Subject: LF: Frequency error.


> Hi LF,
>
> Having replaced the PC last week I found that even though I was using the
> same second sound card & same SpecLab usr profiles imported from my
previous
> PC the sound card sampling & therefore my SpecLab accuracy must have been
> severely effected.
>
> All is ok now.
>
> Thanks to all who replied to my mails.
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT- IO83qp
>