X-GM-THRID: 1216204467021881261 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 2402d630b095c60ff17775cd0d79d740298685ff Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.127.8 with SMTP id z8cs82786huc; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.91.6 with SMTP id t6mr3964329ugl; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id s7si6420531uge.2006.10.03.09.41.20; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GUnD6-00021Y-Ox for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:33:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GUnD6-00021P-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:33:36 +0100 Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.21]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GUnD2-0005h2-3a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:33:36 +0100 Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1GUnC3-0006Nr-07; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:32:31 +0200 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (GiTYkkZ1weiIUDowNNCtT89K7ZH40BIqG9voAXsBVkWyrSmfdG3mw1@[84.145.244.123]) by fwd30.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 1GUnBw-0Wl1EG0; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:32:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de (Hans-Joachim Brandt) References:<45220984.5050008@telus.net> <000f01c6e6e9$455bf260$0100a8c0@HOST> In-Reply-To:<000f01c6e6e9$455bf260$0100a8c0@HOST> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 5.00.0036 Date: 03 Oct 2006 15:54 GMT Message-ID: <1GUnBw-0Wl1EG0@fwd30.sul.t-online.de> X-ID: GiTYkkZ1weiIUDowNNCtT89K7ZH40BIqG9voAXsBVkWyrSmfdG3mw1 X-TOI-MSGID: 573389b9-d0bf-4684-aaa1-d3ba49a3f585 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.575 Subject: Re: LF: Re: miniwhip miniresults...? Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4194 "chastant" schrieb: > Scott..I have had similiar results as mentioned by KC3OL.. > My miniwhip has performed very good even as good as my LF loop that I use= d=20 > for a couple of years.. > I have not noted any intermod problems and it seems to perform well into = HF=20 > although I pretty much use it exclusively on LF. > Get nice signal from 60KHz and 75Khz and down into the VLF--18 and 20Khz. > Mine is up about 35 feet in the trees behind the house 50-75 ft from the= =20 > house. > Rx is the TS870. > de Lloyd W3NF > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "Scott Tilley" > To: ; "LowFER at LW Cafe" > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 2:56 AM > Subject: LF: miniwhip miniresults...? >