X-GM-THRID: 1216776584661178103 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 09a7f85cf25c1539a597b47fe13b510bc793d6a5 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.205.5 with SMTP id c5cs165827hug; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.93.6 with SMTP id v6mr6999548ugl; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k30si1237280ugc.2006.10.09.08.42.57; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GWx87-0005nK-7P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:33:23 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GWx86-0005nB-Q2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:33:22 +0100 Received: from smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GWx83-0003KU-13 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:33:22 +0100 Received: from tnt-2-209.easynet.co.uk ([195.40.196.209] helo=captbrian) by smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1GWx80-000LQW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:33:16 +0100 Message-ID: <012301c6ebb8$3e4d4900$21c428c3@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: References: <000801c6eba9$5caeae70$e6a4c593@RD40002> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:33:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.005 Subject: LF: Re: Re: erp ierp - bluff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4044 I still feel guilty that I managed to bluff my way on this subject in the RAE test in 1949 when I was a physics sixth former and ' knew everything ' If a man from Ofcom turns up here and says "demonstrate that you are not exceeding the 1w ERP specified in your licence" how would I theoretically dispose the dipole to which ERP refers . Assuming the rx antenna is a dipole it would make a big difference how I oriented the Tx dipole to compare with the inverted L and plastic laundry basket former-loading coil. Is there some way of showing and measuring distant FS without putting an antenna there? Certainly the FS will be different if the tx dipole is broadside on or end on . [ ps enjoyed the talk on Saturday - apology if closing my eyes to concentrate on loop bandwith gave impression of dropping off ;-) ] G3GVB/ Bryan bandwidth gave the impression of sleep in the front row ;-) ] ----- Original Message ----- From: "james moritz" To: Sent: 09 October 2006 14:46 Subject: LF: Re: erp ierp VY1JA Dear Bryan, LF Group, ERP is defined by the field strength at a point distant from the TX. Field strength is a measure of how much signal is present at a particular point in space. Of course, if you place a receiving antenna at that point, the signal level at the antenna terminals will be reduced if its polarisation does not correspond to that of the signal. But the field strength itself does not depend on the receiving antenna, or indeed the presence of any antenna at all. In practice, to measure field strength, you usually have to use some kind of calibrated antenna to convert the radio wave into an electrical signal, with a known relationship between field strength and antenna output signal level. It is up to you to ensure that any effect of mismatched polarisation (or directional pattern, mismatch or any other kind of gain or loss)is taken into account. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of captbrian Sent: 08 October 2006 20:01 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: erp ierp VY1JA Well I always thought there was a large loss depending on the extent to which polarisation differed between emitter and recvr.?