X-GM-THRID: 1213996526387562914 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 54a34a6573f5f2267c37e532e3359f33b92aa0b9 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.250.20 with SMTP id x20cs781029qbh; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.254.10 with SMTP id b10mr8338774nfi; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k9si13109024nfc.2006.09.11.09.45.27; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GMopI-0006lu-11 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:40:04 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GMopH-0006ll-63 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:40:03 +0100 Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GMopB-0003jC-Q7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:40:02 +0100 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id l.c30.2c41713 (48348) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:39:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mblk-d27 (mblk-d27.mblk.aol.com [205.188.149.19]) by ciaaol-m04.mx.aol.com (v112.5) with ESMTP id MAILCIAAOLM046-bcdc4505915523e; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:39:49 -0400 References: <45028DB2.2070608@xs4all.nl> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:39:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <45028DB2.2070608@xs4all.nl> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: markusvester@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL eMail 19872 Received: from 217.194.34.103 by mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com (205.188.149.19) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:39:49 -0400 Message-Id: <8C8A3D808589E00-630-AE8@mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 205.188.149.19 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.779,HTML_50_60=0.095,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: LF: Big signal with hum... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C8A3D808563BA4_630_14BD_mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4645 ----------MailBlocks_8C8A3D808563BA4_630_14BD_mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" =20 Dear LF, =20 the "big buzzer" is on again today... it's most certainly the EFR transmitte= r at Budapest-Lakihegy, 135.6 kHz: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=3Dq&hl=3Dde&q=3D47+22+17+N,+19+00+22+E&ie=3DUT= F8&z=3D18&ll=3D47.373866,19.004492&spn=3D0.003426,0.005488&t=3Dk&om=3D1 =20 Several times I could hear relatively weak sweep signals, probably generated= by a network analyzer used for antenna testing. Most of the high power test= s were apparently applying a continuous 010101 sequence at 202.55 baud FSK,=20= causing the hum-like sidebands. Reducing the receiver gain by 7 dB cleared u= p the severe overloading effects on the LF grabber. This left a set of thin=20= red lines spaced at 101 Hz, reaching up to about 136.7 kHz. However with rea= l data, the sidebands will smear out and clutter the lower half of the band=20= during the telegrams. =20 Spectrum taken 06-09-11 6:41, 135.600 kHz at 1100 Hz. Assuming that we will have to live with this beast, I wonder if there is a w= ay to extract its teeth. A signal processing software could decode the data,= model the filter transfer function and estimate the FSK transition times. T= hen one could generate a local replica of the signal, and use that to cancel= it. Seems related to a key-click filter algorithm ( http://www.dxatlas.com/= Rocky/ ) - has anyone in the group tried to implement something similar? =20 Kind regards Markus, DF6NM =20 =20 =20 -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- Von: nl9222@xs4all.nl An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Verschickt: Sa., 9.Sept.2006, 11:47 Thema: Re: LF: Big signal with hum... Dave G3WCB wrote:=20 > Anybody else notice the ghastly big signal with 50Hz hum bars on around=20 > 135,500 kHz? It's been on and off all evening, and is on at the moment=20 > (2250z)=20 > > I thought it was local to me, but it also appears on Marcus's grabber :-= (=20 > > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM=20 =20 Dave and all=20 The signal here was S9 + 50dB, "blackening" the whole band=20 See images ... if they make it here=20 Full band image still is on the grabber [time is in utc]=20 http://www.xs4all.nl/~nl9222/136grab.htm=20 =20 Hopefully this device has been selfdestructed ;-)=20 73 de Ko, NL9222=20 =20 ----------MailBlocks_8C8A3D808563BA4_630_14BD_mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
 
Dear LF,
 
the "big buzzer" is on again today... it's most certainly the EFR trans= mitter at Budapest-Lakihegy, 135.6 kHz:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=3Dq= &hl=3Dde&q=3D47+22+17+N,+19+00+22+E&ie=3DUTF8&z=3D18&ll= =3D47.373866,19.004492&spn=3D0.003426,0.005488&t=3Dk&om=3D1<= /div>
 
Several times I could hear relatively weak sweep signals, probably gene= rated by a network analyzer used for antenna testing. Most of the high power= tests were apparently applying a continuous 010101 sequence at 202.55 baud=20= FSK, causing the hum-like sidebands. Reducing the receiver gain by 7 dB clea= red up the severe overloading effects on the LF grabber. This left a set of=20= thin red lines spaced at 101 Hz, reaching up to about 136.7 kHz. However wit= h real data, the sidebands will smear out and clutter the lower half of the=20= band during the telegrams.
 

Spectrum taken 06-09-11 6:41, 135.600 kHz at 1100 Hz.

Assuming that we will have to live with this beast, I wonder if there is a w= ay to extract its teeth. A signal processing software could decode the data,= model the filter transfer function and estimate the FSK transition times. T= hen one could generate a local replica of the signal, and use that to cancel= it. Seems related to a key-click filter algorithm ( http://www.dxatlas.com/Rocky/ ) - has anyone in the g= roup tried to implement something similar?
 
Kind regards
Markus, DF6NM

 
 
 
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: nl9222@xs4all.nl
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Sa., 9.Sept.2006, 11:47
Thema: Re: LF: Big signal with hum...

Dave G3WCB wrote: 
> Anybody else notice the ghastly big signal with 50Hz hum bars on around=  
> 135,500 kHz? It's been on and off all evening, and is on at the moment&= nbsp;
> (2250z) 
> > I thought it was local to me, but it also appears on Marcus's grab= ber :-( 
> > 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM 
 
Dave and all 
The signal here was S9 + 50dB, "blackening" the whole band 
See images ... if they make it here 
Full band image still is on the grabber [time is in utc] 
http://= www.xs4all.nl/~nl9222/136grab.htm 
 
Hopefully this device has been selfdestructed ;-) 
73 de Ko, NL9222 

 
----------MailBlocks_8C8A3D808563BA4_630_14BD_mblk-d27.sysops.aol.com--