X-GM-THRID: 1214365125472893646 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 28a157b63c3e411c3346f3bec8dd1df9d9700c7d Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.250.20 with SMTP id x20cs852093qbh; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.220.15 with SMTP id s15mr10389652nfg; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p20si16048792nfc.2006.09.12.17.53.49; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GNIyT-0004A0-8W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:51:33 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GNIyS-00049r-SR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:51:32 +0100 Received: from smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GNIyP-0006gL-6B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:51:32 +0100 Received: from tnt-13-213.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.22.213] helo=captbrian) by smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1GNIyN-000AKD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: <009e01c6d6ce$c7e7c4a0$8fce28c3@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: References: <005d01c6d5d8$af2493e0$721686d4@captbrian> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:51:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.073 Subject: LF: Re: Re: RE: Strange detector Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4379 what puzzles me is that you can energise a bulb [300 ma x 12.6volts?] at nearly 4 watts with an ERP of less than 1 watt...........;-)) G3GVB ----- Original Message ----- From: "captbrian" To: Sent: 11 September 2006 20:30 Subject: LF: Re: RE: Strange detector > You have been lucky so far. I would disconnect HF antenna pdq before > LF-ing. > > Bryan > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary - G4WGT" > To: > Sent: 11 September 2006 13:49 > Subject: LF: RE: Strange detector > > > > Hi J & LF, > > > > I have a Yaesu FT-747GX & when I Tx LF I see a light shining out of the > back > > slots onto the wall from the Rx antenna fuse bulb. Yes the bulb is lit to > > full brilliance, the operation FT-747GX doesn't appear to have been > > effected. LF RF is being picked up on the HF antenna. > > > > 73 > > > > Gary - G4WGT. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of J. Allen > > Sent: 11 September 2006 05:38 > > To: LF (RSGB); LowFER at LW Cafe > > Subject: LF: Strange detector > > > > > > Haloo Group, > > > > I wonder how many here have similar oddities to share.... > > > > Another part of my hobby is contesting... I have a RAT PAK remote antenna > > switch which mounts on the tower which is used for LF. The RAT PAK > although > > not in use on LF has a set of six LEDs to indicate which antenna has been > > selected in the shack during HF operation. > > > > This is where the odd indication comes in. Whenever the LF transmitter > > keys, all six LEDs glow softly and the brilliance of the LEDs increase > with > > the power level. It makes a nice indicator that the beacon is working and > > putting out reasonable power. The first time I keyed down with more than > 50 > > watts, it was quite a surprise. 150 Watts glow at what looks like 1/10 of > > brilliance. > > > > Now lets calculate... if 400 watts turns out to really be 1 W ierp here, > > full brilliance would mean how many dB above legal limit? :o) > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > >