X-GM-THRID: 1211450040689915199 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 8242f0f613a6ee470dc8328e6e23af5f9483e3fd Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.249.16 with SMTP id w16cs196487qbh; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.10.3 with SMTP id n3mr6900800nfi; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p45si5445869nfa.2006.08.14.02.27.27; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GCYck-0000qW-67 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:42 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GCYcj-0000qN-DK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:41 +0100 Received: from relay.dera.gov.uk ([192.5.29.49] helo=relay.dstl.gov.uk) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GCYce-0004Fh-SN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:20:41 +0100 Received: (qmail 6177 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2006 10:18:53 +0100 Received: from warlock.dstl.gov.uk (192.5.29.10) by relay.dera.gov.uk with SMTP; 14 Aug 2006 10:18:53 +0100 Message-ID: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803D06B4628F@mail.dstl.gov.uk> From: Talbot Andrew To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:18:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.002,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: RE: LF: Re: antenna: how to get max. cap acity Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5204 The 198kHz transmitter at Droitwich has four wires forming the vertical, with a four wire top hat. When I first put up my LF antenna I thought "they must know what they're doing" and copied the multiple vertical wire concept and chose with 3 up and top wires, although with a spacing of only 300m. At 7m high, and a top hat of 14 m length (x 300mm) with a plethora of ground rods in heavy clay, I manage typically 100 ohms antenna resistance at 137kHz - although it increases by 20 - 50% in wet weather due to extra absorbtion of the reactive E filed in foliage and wet roof tiles. Originally I only had 150mm spacing, and going to 300mm did make a noticeacbe improvement, but I was never serious enough about getting loadsa mega-erp to try making it any larger. The vertical element tapers from a single point about 2m above the groung to the full width at the top. I could try bunching the vertical conductors together to test, but thst would then involve going on the air (!) and actually getting some measured signal reports. Andy G4JNT www.scrbg.org/g4jnt/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT Sent: 12 August 2006 16:48 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: Re: antenna: how to get max. capacity Hi Rik & LF, I remember seeing a multi top wire LF antenna with multi wire vertical conductors somewhere & I found it in the 'Low Frequency Experimenters Handbook' in an article written by Peter G3LDO. He shows a 4 wire top with a 4 wire vertical feed & describes it as a 'Traditional T LF Antenna'. What I am curious about is that if it is detremental to have this multi wire vertical arrangement as you stated, why has Peter shown it in his article? I have an Admiralty book 'Handbook of Wireless Telegraphy' (1938) which shows the same type of T antenna with a multi wire vertical section. I have also seen articles elsewhere (maybe on internet) regarding multi wire verticals & tops were the wires are in a circular arrangement/format & are presented as 'Cage Antennas & Cage Dipoles' although I believe to increase bandwidth. The reason I am interested is that I have thought about a similar arrangement because of my small garden area like Dick. Comments invited please. Gary - G4WGT. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe Sent: 11 August 2006 22:10 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: antenna: how to get max. capacity Quoting captbrian : > Make the vertical of three parallel conductors , each to the centre of each > top wire Using multiple vertical wires will increase the antenna capacitance but also decrease the radiation resistance. I guess that a thing you don't want. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm "This e-mail is intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely upon this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail." "Recipients should note that all e-mail traffic on MOD systems is subject to monitoring and auditing."