X-GM-THRID: 1211693856999760580 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: cd980d437a66e3d2aeb433c7309c95bae8a63ba5 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.249.16 with SMTP id w16cs201073qbh; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.14.4 with SMTP id 4mr1224155nfn; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id o45si9698157nfa.2006.08.14.06.15.09; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GCcCL-0001yw-B4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:41 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GCcCK-0001yn-JQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:40 +0100 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GCcCG-0005Fg-B8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:40 +0100 Received: from [147.197.215.113] (helo=tucana.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1GCcC7-0002Bn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:27 +0100 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by tucana.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GCcC1-0005ef-1K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:21 +0100 From: "james moritz" To: Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c6bfa2$dad44770$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000401c6beb1$e51cda40$18be3b3e@fujitsu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-Information: X-H-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-From: j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.506 Subject: LF: RE: PA4VHF tests/problems? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5527 Dear Dick, LF Group, If the antenna current really is 200mA, then with around 50W of RF, an antenna resistance of over 1k ohm is implied - obviously there is a big disagreement with your antenna impedance measurement. 1k ohm seems like = a very high loss resistance, even for a small antenna. The extra 30 - 40pF of capacity is quite likely to be due to the stray capacitance of the coil and its connections, and would be a reasonable = value for a fairly large diameter coil. Even a single ground rod will have much less than 1k resistance, unless perhaps it is going into desert sand or solid rock or something similar = - in my clay soil, going from several parallel ground rods to a single rod = led to a rise in loss resistance of about 20 ohms. If the resistance really is 1k, and losses actually are occurring in the antenna, earth system, or antenna tuner, you would have a very low Q for = the overall antenna system - about 6, instead of a more normal 50 - 100 or thereabouts. This would make the tuning very "flat". Normally, a change = in the loading inductance of less than 1% would lead to a big mismatch, = leading to very sharp antenna tuning. It would also be hard to achieve a low SWR with 1k or more of loss resistance - if using a separate matching transformer and loading coil, the transformer ratio would have to be = about 1:5, while with a tapped loading coil you would need a big diameter with thin wire to get a match. So if you are using fairly "normal" matching arrangements, and you get a sharp adjustment of resonance, suspicion = must fall on the antenna current meter. You could check this by connecting it = in series between the TX output and dummy load - with 50W into 50R, you = should get 1A RMS of RF current. Clicking sounds from ferrite cored transformers are not unusual - they = are caused my magnetostriction, which is a sort of magnetic version of the piezoelectric effect. A change in flux in the core causes a slight = change in dimensions of the ferrite, producing a sound - SMPS transformers = sometimes "squeal" for this reason. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dick Sent: 13 August 2006 09:24 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: PA4VHF tests/problems? Thanks Alan for the suggestion. Well while tuning the variometer everything seemed working as it should = be. The SWR nice dropped to zero, while the antennacurrent raised. With help of a separate receiver I was able to figure out that I was certainly not tuning on a harmonic. So, there really might be some extra capacitance produced by the coilwindings etc. About the antenna current, one reason might be an insufficient earth, as = I just connected the ground tap to a groundrod with 5m wire to my groundrod 'somewhere' in the garden...