X-GM-THRID: 1208092637425419483 X-Gmail-Labels: lowfer,rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: c9fcc2c812d7dcb3f456c8c12b1c1bc7b61c8d05 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.249.17 with SMTP id w17cs136701qbh; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.254.3 with SMTP id b3mr4172039nfi; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c28si4851781nfb.2006.07.05.12.15.19; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FyCmB-0002SS-LF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:11:07 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FyCmB-0002SJ-1Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:11:07 +0100 Received: from mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FyCm4-0001Jn-Bf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:11:06 +0100 Received: from 88-106-110-197.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com) ([88.106.110.197]) by mk-ironport-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2006 20:10:52 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AR4FAM+oq0SKDw Received: from 88-106-110-197.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.106.110.197]:1648 helo=tcs01) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FyClv-00039l-PD; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:10:51 +0000 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: Cc: "LW Wave" Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:11:02 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <000601c6a060$5b4215c0$0300a8c0@lark> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.843,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: LF: RE: Re: LF loading coils Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5377 Hi Alan & Steve, You made almost identical comments. ***************** Alan wrote Hi Gary, taken simply I would guess the answer is "NO". The loss in the coil is but a small portion of the total loss in the system. ***************** Steve wrote Gary - I think not worth the effort. The loading coil losses are a very small % of total system. ***************** So I will give that idea a "MISS" Thanks to you both for your comments. 73 Gary - G4WGT.