X-GM-THRID: 1206150768922641525 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: bf9894262309c2efe274efbd1f3a600a86bef0c1 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs23371wrc; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.11 with SMTP id c11mr145883nfl; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p72si414338nfc.2006.06.14.01.50.07; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FqQv8-0000m3-OK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:40:14 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FqQv7-0000lu-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:40:13 +0100 Received: from imo-m22.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.3] helo=imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FqQv0-0007gU-ML for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:40:11 +0100 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id l.4c6.1744567 (15699) for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from FWM-M43 (fwm-m43.webmail.aol.com [64.12.193.245]) by air-id05.mx.aol.com (v109.13) with ESMTP id MAILINID51-3d53448fcb5a2ce; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:39:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:39:54 -0400 From: markusvester@aol.com Message-Id: <8C85DA53EBF8945-2C4-2235@FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com> Received: from 217.194.34.119 by FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com (64.12.193.245) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:39:54 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User In-Reply-To: <000001c68f0c$60fb2890$e6a4c593@RD40002> X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 17789 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-AOL-IP: 64.12.193.245 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.044,HTML_50_60=0.095,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: LF: Re: PA4VHF/p problems with core/high voltage etc Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C85DA53EBAC48D_2C4_226F_FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6743 ----------MailBlocks_8C85DA53EBAC48D_2C4_226F_FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Dick, Jim, as Jim pointed out, the flux density B scales inversely with the number of turns. As hysteresis losses go up with the cube of B, I would definitely tend to to stay well below 50 millitesla. I use a similar N30 core with 30 turns primary, it stays perfectly cool at 250 watts. Leakage inductance is not so much an issue for a narrowband LF application and can be minimized by multifilar winding. You will have to use thinner wire, but in your tapped autotransformer configuration copper loss will not be excessive. 73 and good luck Markus -----Original Message----- From: james moritz To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:15 +0100 Subject: LF: RE: PA4VHF/p propblems with core/high voltage etc ... There is a trade-off involved in the number of turns - increasing the number of turns reduces the flux density and so the core loss, but increases the loss in the windings. Also, having a large number of turns makes the leakage inductance higher, and a small number of turns makes the winding inductance too low. ... ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. ----------MailBlocks_8C85DA53EBAC48D_2C4_226F_FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
Dear Dick, Jim,
 
as Jim pointed out, the flux density B scales inversely with the number of turns. As hysteresis losses go up with the cube of B, I would definitely tend to to stay well below 50 millitesla. I use a similar N30 core with 30 turns primary, it stays perfectly cool at 250 watts. Leakage inductance is not so much an issue for a narrowband LF application and can be minimized by multifilar winding. You will have to use thinner wire, but in your tapped autotransformer configuration copper loss will not be excessive.
 
73 and good luck
Markus

-----Original Message-----
From: james moritz <j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:15 +0100
Subject: LF: RE: PA4VHF/p propblems with core/high voltage etc

...
There is a trade-off involved in the number of turns - increasing the number
of turns reduces the flux density and so the core loss, but increases the
loss in the windings. Also, having a large number of turns makes the leakage
inductance higher, and a small number of turns makes the winding inductance
too low.
...


Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
----------MailBlocks_8C85DA53EBAC48D_2C4_226F_FWM-M43.sysops.aol.com--