Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <44845403.8010204@w1tag.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:55:47 -0400
From: John Andrews <w1tag@w1tag.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFEEBNCNAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFEEBNCNAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRSS on 136.318
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Gary,

My apologies -- you're right, of course! This is a case of trying to 
work and do radio email at the same time.

John A.

Gary - G4WGT wrote:
> John,
>
> I believe the frequencies you mean are - NPG in 135.95KHz range & 135.922
> KHz EU activity ?? Hence now best 136.315 to 136.320 ish.
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of John Andrews
> Sent: 05 June 2006 16:25
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: QRSS on 136.318
>
>
> David,
>
> The bandplan was disturbed when a military station (NPG) on the west
> coast of the U.S. fired up in the 136.95 range. The signal was loud
> enough in the eastern U.S. to affect the QRSS reception from EU stations
> around 136.922 kHz. With CFH intermittently operating on 137.0 kHz
> (clobbering +/- 400 kHz or more for many of us), and a number of eastern
> U.S. experimental stations at the top end, the suggestion was made that
> the EU QRSS operation move up above 136. At the time, I suggested
> 136.318, as it offered a decent Loran line window over much of the U.S.
> and Canada.
>
> I'm not sure of the status of the NPG operation at this point. If it has
> finally gone off the air, then the original 136.922 region would again
> be available.
>
> John Andrews, W1TAG
>
>
> G0MRF@aol.com wrote:
>   
>> Isn't QRSS  137+   or 135.7 ish on the bandplan?
>>
>> Not that there's much CW activity these days, but I would have thought
>> the remote receivers are all set up for other frequencies.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>
>