Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <002d01c688b3$69f18fc0$0300a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <494.2048ad9.31b5a042@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:19:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Re: QRSS on 136.318
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi David, thats why it isn't a "Bandplan", only a guide. 135.7 to 136 is now
useless in the States for listening to Eu stations since NPG in Califoria
came up mid last year. The Yanks transmit on 137.77 ish to keep away from
CFH, their recommended frequency for Eu stations trying for T/A was
136.315-320 as being reasonable clear of strong Loran lines. ....and I
haven't heard any hand keyed morse at night for ages....they only want to
work each other once, so soon get bored (miaow). At least you dont get hear
degradation in the summer with QRSS. Inter Eu (QRSS3 and QRSS10) would stand
a better chance around 137.70, as some of us do listen there.

There is still room for lotsa stations to come on and have fun!!

Cheers de Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message -----
From: <G0MRF@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 05 June 2006 15:57
Subject: LF: Re: QRSS on 136.318


>
> Isn't QRSS  137+   or 135.7 ish on the bandplan?
>
> Not that there's much CW activity these days, but I would have thought the
> remote receivers are all set up for other frequencies.
>
> David
>
>
>
> In a message dated 05/06/2006 14:28:52 GMT Standard Time, cpm@planet.nl
> writes:
>
> hello all,
>
> this evening we will transmit  qrss90.
> freq,136318hz
> freq.136319hz
>
> captures would be appreciated,and please let us  know if you see any
trace.
>
>
>
>
>
>