X-GM-THRID: 1206343404665304827 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 3270a060fd668e4afc25ea5f1e3d6a803ecaa175 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs8339wrc; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.47.9 with SMTP id u9mr970984huu; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 32si809915hui.2006.06.16.04.52.00; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FrCng-0005cP-C7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:47:44 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FrCnf-0005cG-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:47:43 +0100 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FrCnc-0007hW-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:47:43 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2006 11:47:32 -0000 Received: from pD953BF74.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO router) [217.83.191.116] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 13:47:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #9373712 Message-ID: <000c01c6913b$dc0bd9e0$0600a8c0@router> From: "Uwe Wensauer" To: References: <44894231.30866.D42969@localhost><00b601c68baa$e8cf78d0$26180d54@traceydlqceh0p> <44894CF9.4080102@usa.net><4491E6FB.2020705@usa.net> <20060616022030.coqaz7zeo7y8wgw8@webmail.versatel.de> <002101c6910f$d5868e20$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <000e01c6912b$003878c0$c2b66dcb@cobaltxp> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:56:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: PAs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6577 Hello Murray, I assume that this message was not for me But on the other hand, I am highly intersted in Building a LF- TX You metioned in the letter. At present time I struggling in programming a Attiny 2313 as a replacement for AT90S2313. 73 Uwe, DK1KQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Murray ZL1BPU" To: Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:55 AM Subject: LF: Re: Re: PAs > Uwe, > > It certainly looks like 2nd harmonic problems to me too, probably linearity > (gain) imbalance. Another thing you will have discovered is that with the > harmonic information Peter mentioned, the SWR meter or bridge (if you use > one) won't give good nulls, because the harmonic content won't be matched at > the antenna tuner. > > Either you need a rather better low pass filter, or to sort out the > non-linearity. My LF TX operates in Class D (can't get more nonlinear than > that) but the waveform is nicely sinusoidal at the antenna. Mind you, third > harmonic is my problem, not second. > > 73, > Murray ZL1BPU > >