Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <000701c69250$2a7cd1a0$0ec828c3@captbrian>
From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000701c69233$ce4c92b0$17e4fc3e@g3kev>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:53:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: LF LOW
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

You are fifteen  years too late. The time to complain was back then when an
organisation decided there was more money to be made from three
 box-operators than one radio amateur and persuaded govt. to reduce
technical knowledge for an amateur licence. You'll have an uphill struggle
to reverse it now.

G3GVB


----- Original Message -----
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: "rsgb" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 17 June 2006 18:30
Subject: LF: LF LOW


> LF seems to be an all time low, no acty at all recently, it is hardly
worth
> the effort.The internet and mobile phones seem to be a better bet,
followed
> by vhf/uhf then hf if you want to talk to someone.
> Most operators are now appliance ops, no cw or technical skills required
any
> more.The norm now is buy a box, plug in and go. In fact most amateurs
today
> cannot solder, or even change a fuse, hardly amateur radio.
>
> 73 G3KEV
>
>
>
>
>