X-GM-THRID: 1206346479055773660 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 9b1f50a20019e3c6a62c96399e97346867b5880c Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs10084wrc; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.40.10 with SMTP id n10mr897289hun; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 2si652378hue.2006.06.16.05.40.52; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FrDYO-0005mQ-IC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:36:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FrDYN-0005mH-UW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:35:59 +0100 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FrDYJ-00084O-7J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:35:59 +0100 Received: from [147.197.215.113] (helo=tucana.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1FrDUH-0004fp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:31:45 +0100 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by tucana.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1FrDUB-0000jT-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:31:39 +0100 From: "james moritz" To: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:31:38 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c69140$d0843ea0$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20060616022030.coqaz7zeo7y8wgw8@webmail.versatel.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-Information: X-H-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-From: j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.926 Subject: LF: RE: PAs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5100 Dear Uwe, LF Group, It certainly would be worth investigating where the apparent second = harmonic distortion is coming from - assuming a reasonably balanced push-pull PA design, even-order distortion products should be at very low levels. I = would suggest using the 'scope to check the drain voltage waveforms of the IRFP450s (using x10 probes). If the waveforms are significantly = different at each drain, this would indicate some kind of component or construction fault. In an ideal class D design, the drain voltage should be a = "half-wave rectified sine" waveform, but the actual drain waveforms can be quite frightening in some amateur class D designs! It is surprising that quite a lot of higher harmonics seem to be getting through the low pass filter onto the feeder. One thing that does occur = is resonance at various frequencies in the LF/MF range. At the working frequency the antenna and loading coil is normally series resonant. As = the frequency rises, the antenna + loading coil impedance becomes inductive, = but this can then resonate with the capacitance of the coax feeder to become parallel resonant. At higher frequencies, the feeder itself could = resonate - 90m of coax would be lambda/4 somewhere around 550kHz. So the impedance = at the input to the feeder can vary very widely at quite low harmonic frequencies, which might lead to reduced attenuation of harmonics by the low-pass filter. It would be interesting to see what happened if you = changed the length of the feeder, by adding another length of coax, for example. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@versanet.de Sent: 16 June 2006 01:21 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: PAs Hi all, I`m somewhat surprised / disappointed: I tested the TX aerial with the ROPEX (157W) and with the homebrew PA (reduced to 150W). ROPEX: phase of V and A on the feeder cable OK. Homebrew: phase of V and A =3D chaotic (but it works). see oszilloscope pics. the feeder is a 90m long koax cable RG213U. if connecting a 50 Ohm dummy instead of the aerial both TXs show the = same in phase of V and A.