X-GM-THRID: 1206092537594065782 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: d594d8d9871d10847afef0e5e10c2b8dc5b134d5 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs3885wrc; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.58.9 with SMTP id l9mr6006227nfk; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id b1si6992327nfe.2006.06.13.10.24.35; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FqCTw-0007kr-QX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:12 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FqCTv-0007ki-Po for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:11 +0100 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FqCTq-0000xg-Ql for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:11 +0100 Received: from [147.197.215.113] (helo=tucana.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1FqCQ9-0001V8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:17 +0100 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by tucana.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1FqCQ8-0006Cc-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:16 +0100 From: "james moritz" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:11:15 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c68f0c$60fb2890$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <002601c68eee$51f35520$2102000a@ibm> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-Information: X-H-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected X-UH-MailScanner-From: j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.747 Subject: LF: RE: PA4VHF/p propblems with core/high voltage etc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5249 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dick Sent: 13 June 2006 14:34 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: PA4VHF/p propblems with core/high voltage etc Aperently the N30 core seems to be not the best solution as an step-up transformer. Luckely I do have another 3c85 core (50-60mm) lying around. Is it better to use this one instead of the N30 material?? Dear Dick, LF Group, The peak flux density in the core is given by B(peak) =3D Vrms/(4.44.f.n.Ae) (for a sine wave voltage) Where=20 B(peak) is peak flux density, T Vrms is the voltage across the winding, V f is frequency (Hz) n is number of turns Ae is effective cross-sectional area in m^2(nearly the same as actual cross-sectional area for a toroid) (Be careful of the units - the manufacturer's data is often given as = mm^2, cm^2, square inches, etc...) The flux density does not depend on the type of ferrite - so if you are using cores of similar cross-section, and the same number of turns, the = flux density is similar also. What does change is the specific core loss, Pv, which is a function of type of ferrite, flux density and frequency. For = 3C85 at 137kHz and 100mT (for 500W TX and so Vrms =3D 158V, and 16t primary), = Pv is somewhere around 160kW/m^3, according to the graphs in my old Philips = data book. The effective volume of a TX51 size toroid is 21500mm^3, (i.e. = 2.15 x 10e-5 m^3 - careful of units, again), making the total power loss in the core about 3.4W. Obviously I am just guessing about what size the core = is, but it should be about right. To this you will need to add some watts of losses in the winding resistance. Overall, this will be a substantial improvement on the N30 material, but will require good ventilation all = the same. There is a trade-off involved in the number of turns - increasing the = number of turns reduces the flux density and so the core loss, but increases = the loss in the windings. Also, having a large number of turns makes the = leakage inductance higher, and a small number of turns makes the winding = inductance too low. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU