X-GM-THRID: 1203438430927278879 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: f093ea2d1fa8c2dc69bb85575ac48dea0529096f Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.72.5 with SMTP id u5cs23704wra; Mon, 15 May 2006 03:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.41.16 with SMTP id t16mr3290034nfj; Mon, 15 May 2006 03:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g1si5551699nfe.2006.05.15.03.18.41; Mon, 15 May 2006 03:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ffa7S-0004qY-LI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:16:06 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ffa7R-0004qO-Sl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:16:05 +0100 Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz ([203.109.254.43]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FfbdP-0001d9-Ur for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:53:16 +0100 Received: from 203-173-156-36.bliink.ihug.co.nz (athlon1200) [203.173.156.36] by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ffa7I-0000jS-00; Mon, 15 May 2006 22:15:56 +1200 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.392 [268.5.6/339]); Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:14 +1200 Message-ID: <05a501c67808$98d51250$7900a8c0@athlon1200> From: "Dave Brown" To: References: <003c01c67744$f08f9160$2201a8c0@PC2> <001a01c6777d$448fa600$2201a8c0@pcroelof> <043e01c67799$8ccbb5a0$7900a8c0@athlon1200> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:14 +1200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: T/A May 14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=Windows-1252; reply-type=response X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5379 Disregard the comment about signal strength variation with height, Roelof - I must have had a bad night last night! Of course it will vary with height, regardless of feedline issues - silly me! Interested to hear about the BFR96 though. Surprised no one jumped on me about the height thing - you lot must all be asleep - or maybe just waking up!! (except ZL4OL) 73 Dave, ZL3FJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Brown" To: Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:01 AM Subject: LF: Re: T/A May 14 > Hi Roelof > Can you be quite sure the feedline is not contributing to your > received signal level? Any variation in strength with height would > be a good indication that it is. > Interesting to note your proposed use of the BFR96- have to say > 2N5109s are not easy to find now. Is the BFR96 used in this instance > from the SMD aspect and is there any performance degradation from > this. > 73 > Dave > ZL3FJ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roelof Bakker" > To: > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:38 AM > Subject: LF: T/A May 14 > > >> Hello all, >> >> I have designed a new PCB for the mini-whip with SMD parts, except >> for the >> 2N5109. >> The latter will be exchanged for a BFR96 in the near future. sniptherest************ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 14/05/2006