Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:46:50 +0100
Message-ID: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFKEOBCLAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <614326444.20060405222228@t-online.de>
Importance: Normal
Subject: RE: LF: Trans Pacific Tests?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

HI Dave & Hartmut,

Thanks for the info, it must be quite a distance for my daylight capture.
What is RU6LA's location?

I don't normally leave the receiver on during the day while I am out working
but with the present activity I decided to do that. The antenna was my Tx
14Mtr vertical.

73

Gary.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Hartmut Wolff
Sent: 05 April 2006 21:22
To: Gary - G4WGT
Subject: Re: LF: Trans Pacific Tests?


Hi Gary,
attached a screenshot of the RU6LA transmission. It seems Ed had some
trouble with txing FSK and changed to QRSS.

73
Hartmut


> Hi All,

> I have captured this signal shown in attachment today in daylight, the
time
> line is on the left is 1800z & the LORAN line is the 137787.6Hz line so
the
> signal seems to be around 137788.5Hz, also there was a weaker 3 element
> block at about 1730z (not shown). I feel sure that signal in the capture
is
> nothing to do with the tests but it shows something very near the
frequency.
> The slight receiver drift is caused by the central heating. I have shown
the
> LORAN line also to indicate my receiver stability because the captured
> signal looks quite erratic.

> Can anyone enlighten me on what I may have captured?

> Regards,

> Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp

> Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor